gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()

Bug #1131876 reported by Rainer Rohde
48
This bug affects 9 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Not sure what caused this, but I was unplugging or plugging in my Nexus7

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: gvfs-backends 1.15.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-7.15-generic 3.8.0
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Feb 22 10:08:17 2013
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp
MarkForUpload: True
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp --spawner :1.8 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/3
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7fdb292f20bc: mov 0x20(%rax),%rax
 PC (0x7fdb292f20bc) ok
 source "0x20(%rax)" (0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaca) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gvfs/libgvfsdaemon.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_unref () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_value_unset () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Rainer Rohde (rainer-rohde) wrote :
information type: Private → Public
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
crtm (carlosrtm) wrote :

Chras when plugging or unplugging my Samsung Galaxy S2

Revision history for this message
crtm (carlosrtm) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Thomas Hotz (thotz-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

I have reported a similar bug see #1130101.
​​

Revision history for this message
Philip Langdale (langdalepl) wrote :

It's the same bug. The retracing bot will identify them as dupes when it finally gets around to processing them.

This one's a bit weird, but until I see the re-traced backtrace I can't tell what's really going on, but it looks an awful lot like a bug that should have been fixed in 1.15.3, so I'm puzzled to see it show up with that version.

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1149135, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.