Doesn't read the user ssh config

Bug #1065523 reported by Fantu
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs
Fix Released
Medium
gvfs (Ubuntu)
Triaged
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Using ubuntu 12.04 I found a problem already reported in bug 264803 and solved some years ago.
For example using nautilus sftp://server1 doesn't work using the host defined on ~/.ssh/config.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gvfs 1.12.1-0ubuntu1.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-31.50-generic 3.2.28
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Oct 11 15:47:06 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta amd64 (20120317)
SourcePackage: gvfs
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Fantu (fantonifabio) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Antonio (antoniomariano) wrote :

I have the same problem in Ubuntu 12.10. I've set up a proxy in my .ssh/config file, it works on the command line but is ignored if I try to use it in nautilus.
If I'm not mistaken nautilus uses gvfs as a backend to mount remote filesystem, dunno if gvfs is supposed to read the ssh configuration file at all so this would turn the bug into a feature request.
As a workaround I'm using sshfs to mount the remote filesystem, looks like it reads the .ssh/config file correctly, it can be found in the repository.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The issue you are reporting is an upstream one and it would be nice if somebody having it could send the bug to the developers of the software by following the instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME. If you have done so, please tell us the number of the upstream bug (or the link), so we can add a bugwatch that will inform us about its status. Thanks in advance.

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Antonio (antoniomariano) wrote :

Hi,

I just filed a bug report, it can be found at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688308

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thank you for upstreaming the bug!

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Changed in gvfs:
importance: Unknown → Medium
status: Unknown → New
Changed in gvfs:
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in gvfs:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Changed in gvfs:
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Changed in gvfs:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.