gvfsd-fuse crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

[Sasa Paporovic]

On ejecting a cd with rythembox abilities this crash happends.

right mouse click on the cd symbol in rythembox -> ejecting from the opening option menu -> the cd ejects from drive -> the crash happens.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: gvfs-fuse 1.13.9-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-15.22-generic 3.5.4
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-15-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.5.2-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Sep 26 22:28:55 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-fuse
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Beta amd64+mac (20120923)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs//gvfsd-fuse -f /home/username/.gvfs
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no username)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f0ec24dfc5f: mov 0x10(%r14),%r8
 PC (0x7f0ec24dfc5f) ok
 source "0x10(%r14)" (0x706f2d616964657d) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%r8" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 malloc () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 g_malloc () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_strdup () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_strdupv () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: gvfsd-fuse crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

[Apport retracing service (apport)]

StacktraceTop:
 _int_malloc (av=0x7f0eac000020, bytes=6) at malloc.c:3463
 __GI___libc_malloc (bytes=6) at malloc.c:2924
 g_malloc (n_bytes=n_bytes@entry=6) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.14/./glib/gmem.c:159
 g_strdup (str=0x7f0eac014950 "media") at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.14/./glib/gstrfuncs.c:364
 g_strdupv (str_array=0x7f0eac015d70) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.14/./glib/gstrfuncs.c:2439

[Rolf Leggewie (r0lf)]

are bug 1057140 and bug 1057090 dupes?