revert client side decoration, breaks everything and then some

Bug #584228 reported by David Nielsen on 2010-05-22
132
This bug affects 25 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

gtk+2.0 2.21.0-1ubuntu2 reintroduced the highlyu destructive client side decoration patch
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maverick-changes/2010-May/000511.html

which lead to pretty much a full halt on testing since everything crashes now.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1490166

Please revert the patch and continue testing in an opt-in ppa with a proper call for testing being issued, till such a time as the patch and our applications are ready for the feature to be merged. Right now it is holding up all other testing which is unacceptable.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: libgtk2.0-0 2.21.0-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.34-3.10-generic 2.6.34
Uname: Linux 2.6.34-3-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat May 22 16:27:31 2010
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=da_DK.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gtk+2.0

Jean.c.h (slug71) on 2010-05-22
Changed in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
sojourner (itsmealso2) wrote :

confirmed , I have the same result . NOTE ! attempting to revert by forcing the previous libgtk2.20.0-0ubuntu4(lucid) wants to remove MANY packages . please fix soonest .

Tom Pino (metalsmith-rangeweb) wrote :

This really is just about shutting down a lot of boxes. There is no sense it booting up an OS where most of the most used apps will not run correctly.

I am pretty lucky in that enabling effects, which I absolutely hate, does make the system run.

Kjell L. (lkjell) wrote :

I build the packages removing the patch and everything seems to be normal now.

Anton Anikin (anton-anikin) wrote :

Could you share the built package?

Kjell L. (lkjell) wrote :

Sorry I do not have a ppa set up.

*Just download the source with apt-get source gtk+2.0.
*Remove the diff and dsc file
*cd to debian/patches and edit the series file. Comment patch 064 with a # at the beginning.

And then you build the package like you would. More information at MOTU page. If it complains about gnome-pkg-tools then just install that package.

It took around 1.5h to build everything.

Kjell L. (lkjell) wrote :

But if you really trust me then I am uploading the binaries to uio.no/~kjele/gtk right now.

Per Johansson (xeizoo) wrote :

Thank you! Det var "flott" :)

I'll be testing as soon as I get home tonight ...

dino99 (9d9) wrote :

cant find link from #7 but: http://folk.uio.no/kjele/gtk/

Mingming Ren (portis25) wrote :

Try my ppa,
portis25/ia32libs

Peerawat (aeaee) on 2010-05-23
Changed in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Changed in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
importance: Low → High
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

thank you for your bug report, the tone you are using and calling others work destructive is not correct though, it's early in the unstable cycle and those changes need testing, you should be running lucid if you need a stable installation there

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the bug there seems to be a duplicate of other specific issues on softwares

tags: added: gtk-csd
tags: removed: gtk-csd
Changed in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the bug there seems to be a duplicate of other specific issues on softwares, closing it, open bugs about specific issues rather when you get one

Changed in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu):
importance: High → Low
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

see bug 584959 for example

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers