Activity log for bug #34675

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2006-03-13 01:34:07 Lukas Sabota bug added bug
2006-03-13 01:34:27 Lukas Sabota update-manager: severity Normal Minor
2006-03-13 01:34:27 Lukas Sabota update-manager: statusexplanation
2006-03-13 06:26:03 Sebastian Heinlein update-manager: status Unconfirmed Confirmed
2006-03-13 06:26:03 Sebastian Heinlein update-manager: priority Medium
2006-03-13 06:26:03 Sebastian Heinlein update-manager: severity Minor Normal
2006-03-13 06:26:50 Sebastian Heinlein bug added attachment 'wrong_fg_color_for_insensitive_selected_cell.png' (a screenshot of the glitch)
2006-03-14 17:33:02 Sebastian Heinlein bug added attachment 'test-insensite-text.py' (test case)
2006-12-14 18:15:07 Sebastien Bacher gtk+2.0: status Confirmed Needs Info
2006-12-14 18:15:07 Sebastien Bacher gtk+2.0: importance Medium Wishlist
2006-12-14 18:15:07 Sebastien Bacher gtk+2.0: statusexplanation Thank you for your bug. Could you argue on why the selection should not be displayed? That looks like a design decision to me and one way doesn't seem to be wronger than the other
2006-12-14 18:15:07 Sebastien Bacher gtk+2.0: assignee desktop-bugs
2007-01-11 09:57:13 Daniel Holbach gtk+2.0: status Needs Info Rejected
2007-01-11 09:57:13 Daniel Holbach gtk+2.0: statusexplanation Thank you for your bug. Could you argue on why the selection should not be displayed? That looks like a design decision to me and one way doesn't seem to be wronger than the other Your bug lacks information we would need to investigate further. We are now going to close the bug - please reopen if you have more information at hand.
2007-01-12 00:10:46 Sebastian Heinlein gtk+2.0: status Rejected Confirmed
2007-01-12 00:10:46 Sebastian Heinlein gtk+2.0: statusexplanation Your bug lacks information we would need to investigate further. We are now going to close the bug - please reopen if you have more information at hand. What kind of information do you still need? It is not about what should be shown. The font color of selected insensitive treeview rows should be a shade of grey. Currently it is black. So there is no visual difference between an insensitive and a sensitive row.
2007-01-12 00:11:48 Sebastian Heinlein description When upgrading a machine, the package that was selected last will not be greyed out like the other packages. To reproduce: 1) Open update-manager and update your sources. (be sure there are updates available) 2) Click on any package 3) Press upgrade Unusual Behavior: The previously selected package will look different from all of the other nonselected packages. This may be because the selected flag of that selection is still true. This previously selected package should look the the rest of the packages. The font color of selected insensitive treeview rows should be a shade of grey. Currently it is black. So there is no visual difference between an insensitive and a sensitive row.
2007-01-12 00:11:48 Sebastian Heinlein title Polish: previously selected package isn't completely greyed when upgrading No viusal difference between insensitive and sensitive selected rows in a treeview
2007-01-12 10:26:14 Sebastien Bacher bug assigned to gtk (upstream)
2007-01-12 12:42:53 Bug Watch Updater gtk: status Unknown Unconfirmed
2008-09-06 13:09:24 Sebastien Bacher gtk+2.0: status Confirmed Triaged
2008-09-06 13:09:24 Sebastien Bacher gtk+2.0: statusexplanation What kind of information do you still need? It is not about what should be shown. The font color of selected insensitive treeview rows should be a shade of grey. Currently it is black. So there is no visual difference between an insensitive and a sensitive row.
2010-09-16 04:14:58 Bug Watch Updater gtk: importance Unknown Medium
2015-02-18 11:20:57 Bug Watch Updater gtk: status New Expired