Ubuntu
grub2 package

package linux-image-2.6.32-32-generic 2.6.32-32.62 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Bug #790408 reported by piperastaman on 2011-05-30

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #495123: grub-probe: error: not a directory. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	grub2 (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: grub2

i have no clue... sorry. i was directed here automatically, 'cause i thought that the automated sending of the necessary information would be enough and would be helpfull. apparently i must actively describe something. well, a little while after i commanded (clicked) the updates to start, i came back and a message was telling me that it has not been possible because if dependencies or something. (...)
i can do without the 2.6.32-32 i guess...
but if somebody wants to give it a try, just tell me what and i will type it into the console and copy paste here whatever comes out.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-32-generic 2.6.32-32.62
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic 2.6.32.32+drm33.14
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue May 31 01:26:08 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package linux-image-2.6.32-32-generic 2.6.32-32.62 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Tags:

Revision history for this message

piperastaman (piperastaman) wrote on 2011-05-30:

AptOrdering.txt Edit (919 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (1.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Df.txt Edit (450 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dmesg.txt Edit (120.9 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgTerminalLog.txt Edit (40.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

piperastaman (piperastaman) wrote on 2011-06-01:

good news - even if i cannot know why...
next time the system asked to be updated everything worked fine and after the (required)restart i noticed that now i have 2.6.32-32
so i guess it solved itself !

Revision history for this message

Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote on 2011-06-22:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 495123, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.