package linux-image-2.6.35-26-generic 2.6.35-26.46 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 127

[manuelbaldomero]

Binary package hint: grub2

every time that i try to install a package give error

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: linux-image-2.6.35-26-generic 2.6.35-26.46
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Feb 26 03:30:55 2011
ErrorMessage: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 127
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429)
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package linux-image-2.6.35-26-generic 2.6.35-26.46 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 127

[manuelbaldomero (jeymbj)]

no more comments

[Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)]

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

[Colin Watson (cjwatson)]

The terminal log says:

  /etc/default/grub: 23: Uncomment: not found

It seems that you've edited /etc/default/grub in a way that made its syntax invalid. You need to edit it again and fix it. You can test whether you've got it right using 'sh -n /etc/default/grub', which should produce no output if the file has valid syntax.

Bug 484499 is about the fact that the upgrade crashed rather than warning you about this and giving you the opportunity to fix it.

[manuelbaldomero (jeymbj)]

thank you very much

On 29/06/11 13:16, Colin Watson wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 484499 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484499
>
> The terminal log says:
>
> /etc/default/grub: 23: Uncomment: not found
>
> It seems that you've edited /etc/default/grub in a way that made its
> syntax invalid. You need to edit it again and fix it. You can test
> whether you've got it right using 'sh -n /etc/default/grub', which
> should produce no output if the file has valid syntax.
>
> Bug 484499 is about the fact that the upgrade crashed rather than
> warning you about this and giving you the opportunity to fix it.
>
> ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 484499
> [MASTER] syntax errors in /etc/default/grub break upgrades
>