On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:55:48PM -0000, Jean-Paul wrote:
> @Colin: Ok, thanks for clearing that up.
> I'm also glad to see that Canonical finally understands that it isn't
> always the best option to bluntly *hide* grub2.
Neither I nor the Canonical design team should be equated with Canonical
as a whole. In any case, what Ubuntu does by default isn't the same as
what users should be able to configure, and I think we've all always
recognised that. That isn't necessarily the same as giving the
configuration high priority, of course ...
It's actually a community contributor, Jo Shields, who's been working on
Ubuntu theming for GRUB's gfxmenu.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:55:48PM -0000, Jean-Paul wrote:
> @Colin: Ok, thanks for clearing that up.
> I'm also glad to see that Canonical finally understands that it isn't
> always the best option to bluntly *hide* grub2.
Neither I nor the Canonical design team should be equated with Canonical
as a whole. In any case, what Ubuntu does by default isn't the same as
what users should be able to configure, and I think we've all always
recognised that. That isn't necessarily the same as giving the
configuration high priority, of course ...
It's actually a community contributor, Jo Shields, who's been working on
Ubuntu theming for GRUB's gfxmenu.