This bug is NOT a duplicate. I would like to concur with Jeremy LaCroix in that kernel updates should not be changing (hdx,y) values when adding a new kernel. I am inserting my log of setting up a system with mixed pata/sata. My question is "Will the kernel update honor the contents of my device.map file or will it ERRONEOUSLY do a BIOS probe and screw up my Windows disk?". ============================================== I am setting up a mixed IDE/SATA system. There will be three disks, IDE0 is 100% Windows, SATA0 is 100% U8.04, SATA1 is 100% U7.04. I am setting this up with SATA0 as the BIOS boot drive with a menu.list to choose from. The menu.list specifies (hd0) as boot. First I set up the SATA drives. Here is the status after setting up with just the two sata disks and booted into SATA0: root@voyager:# cd /boot/grub root@voyager:/boot/grub# cat device.map (hd0) /dev/sda (hd1) /dev/sdb ...and all is good to go. After adding the IDE0 disk, the SATA drives are changed to: root@voyager:/boot/grub# fdisk -l|grep Disk Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes <---------IDE0 100% Windows Disk identifier: 0xc8e067c5 Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes <---------SATA0 U8.04 BIOS boot drive, was sda Disk identifier: 0x94759475 Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes <---------SATA1 U7.04 , was sdb Disk identifier: 0x00027610 root@voyager:/boot/grub# ...I modified U8.04 device.map root@voyager:/boot/grub# cat device.map #@# per fdisk -l and hardware: ide0=sda Windows, sata0=sdb U8.04, sata1=sdc U7.04 #@# the boot/root drive in menu.list is hd0=sata0=sdb U8.04 (hd2) /dev/sda (hd0) /dev/sdb (hd1) /dev/sdc root@voyager:/boot/grub# The hope is that when there is a kernel upgrade, that the device.map file will control which disk's MBR gets updated. I would like for the update to be applied to (hd0)=sata0=sdb, not IDE0. Let's see what happens if I go: root@voyager:/boot/grub# grub Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename. ] grub> root (hd0,0) root (hd0,0) grub> setup (hd0) setup (hd0) Error 17: Cannot mount selected partition grub> find /boot/grub/stage1 find /boot/grub/stage1 (hd1,0) (hd2,0) grub> BULLBUTTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why is grub IGNORING my device.map? Clearly I have mapped (hd0) /dev/sdb. It is obvious to me that grub is looking at (hd0) as /dev/sda. grrrrr! To continue, I quit grub and rename device.map, and then run grub again: root@voyager:/boot/grub# grub Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename. ] grub> ....and then it hits me like a brick. Grub is probing BIOS! grrrrr! There is no complaint about the non-existing device.map. Why doesn't grub report the results of the BIOS probe? Why is there a device.map file? I do a man grub and find: --device-map=FILE use the device map file FILE OH! Lets try grub again: root@voyager:/boot/grub# grub --device-map=/boot/grub/device.map [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename. ] grub> find /boot/grub/stage1 find /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0,0) (hd1,0) grub> Wow!!!!! and then: grub> root (hd0,0) root (hd0,0) grub> setup (hd0) setup (hd0) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+16 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/menu.lst"... succeeded Done. grub> Now to reboot:.......................... Hey! It worked. In closing, I have two questions: 1. Can grub report the results of the BIOS probe? 2. Which disk is going to have its MBR updated on the next kernel upgrade? IOW, will the upgrade honor the device.map file or will it do its own BIOS probe? If the update fubars my IDE0=100% Windows MBR, it is going to be Grrrrrrrr time again! Respectfully; John Gelm