Activity log for bug #712837

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2011-02-04 00:33:34 Alex Valavanis bug added bug
2011-02-04 00:36:18 Alex Valavanis attachment added grace_5.1.22-9ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grace/+bug/712837/+attachment/1828339/+files/grace_5.1.22-9ubuntu1.debdiff
2011-02-04 00:36:56 Alex Valavanis tags amd64 apport-bug natty apport-bug natty
2011-02-04 00:37:08 Alex Valavanis grace (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Low
2011-02-04 00:37:23 Alex Valavanis bug added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors Team
2011-02-04 00:52:32 Alex Valavanis bug watch added http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611950
2011-02-04 00:52:32 Alex Valavanis bug task added grace (Debian)
2011-02-04 09:13:06 Alex Valavanis grace (Ubuntu): status New In Progress
2011-02-04 09:13:10 Alex Valavanis grace (Ubuntu): assignee Alex Valavanis (valavanisalex)
2011-02-04 10:10:09 Bug Watch Updater grace (Debian): status Unknown Fix Released
2011-02-04 23:20:39 Bryce Harrington removed subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors Team
2011-02-05 10:19:20 Alex Valavanis grace (Ubuntu): status In Progress New
2011-02-05 10:19:24 Alex Valavanis grace (Ubuntu): assignee Alex Valavanis (valavanisalex)
2011-04-26 11:01:45 Alex Valavanis summary upstream changelog is installed with incorrect name Consider overriding lintian "wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog" warning in grace
2011-04-26 11:01:49 Alex Valavanis grace (Ubuntu): status New Triaged
2011-04-26 11:18:13 Alex Valavanis description Binary package hint: grace A local build of grace_5.1.22-9 raised the lintian warning: "wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog". This occurs because Debian policy dictates that the upstream changelog should be installed to /usr/share/doc/grace/changelog.gz but we install it to /usr/share/doc/grace/CHANGES.html. The relevant policy section can be found at http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-changelogs The reason why this is happening, is that we include the upstream changelog in the debian/grace.docs file in the source package which is parsed by dh_installdocs. Instead, we should use dh_installchangelogs to create a compressed, plain-text copy of the changelog. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: grace 1:5.1.22-9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Feb 4 00:20:45 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100318) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grace Binary package hint: grace When grace is built in Ubuntu, lintian mistakenly gives a "wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog" warning. The reason for this is as follows: Upstream changelogs are not installed in Ubuntu by default... however, the grace package installs two other documentation files which happen to be called "CHANGES" and "doc/CHANGES.html". Lintian mistakenly thinks that these files are the upstream changelog, and it complains because they are not called "ChangeLog.gz" as it expects. This problem does not exist in Debian, because their build system *does* install the upstream changelog... lintian sees it, and is happy! As far as I am aware, there is no way for us to tell lintian that the CHANGES* files are not upstream changelogs. We may want to consider overriding the lintian warning in Ubuntu. However, it is a very minor problem, and it's probably not worth branching from Debian for this reason alone. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: grace 1:5.1.22-9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Feb 4 00:20:45 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100318) ProcEnviron:  LANGUAGE=en_GB:en  PATH=(custom, user)  LANG=en_GB.UTF-8  LC_MESSAGES=en_GB.utf8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grace