HBCI doesn't work on Gnucash 2.2.9 and libaqbanking 4.1.2

[Norbert]

Binary package hint: gnucash

I cant sent a accout transfer via online banking to my bank (I use Ubuntu 9.10).

The query for the account transactions are working fine. And the assistant to set up the aqbanking-settings works also.

But when I sent a transfer the online banking is not working. I found this messagges in the /tmp/gnucash.trace:

* 09:54:18 WARN <aqhbci> jobsingletransfer.c: 652: No local name, filling in
* 09:54:18 WARN <aqhbci> msgengine.c: 388: SystemId requested (deprecated)
* 09:54:18 WARN <aqbanking> de.c: 116: Bank data for KtoBlzCheck not found (-51), falling back to default
* 09:54:18 CRIT <aqhbci> msgcrypt_pintan.c: 252: Error getting pin from medium (-67)
* 09:54:18 CRIT <aqhbci> jobqueue.c: 442: Could not encode message (-67)
* 09:54:18 CRIT <aqhbci> outbox.c: 1410: Error performing queue (-1)
* 09:54:18 CRIT <aqhbci> jobsingletransfer.c: 1556: No segment results
* 09:54:18 WARN <aqbanking> banking_online.c: 141: Not a single job successfully executed

An this is answer from the gnucash mailing list:

---------------------------------
Martin Preuss schrieb:
> On Montag, 7. September 2009, Norbert Holze wrote:
> [...]
>> * 10:01:18 CRIT <aqhbci> msgcrypt_pintan.c: 252: Error getting pin
>> from medium (-67)
> [...]
>
> "-67" ist "NOT_IMPLEMENTED", soll heissen: In GnuCash wurde ein callback nicht
> gesetzt...

... oh, ja. - Ganz offensichtlich ein Programmierfehler in Gnucash.

Du solltest das Problem definitiv als Ubuntu-Bug berichten (unter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+filebug ), evtl. wird
das ja noch in Ubuntu 9.10 behoben bevor es veröffentlicht wird.
----------------------------------

At Jaunty, Gnucash 2.2.9 form getdeb worked fine.

[Norbert (asterix52)]

Hi!

I got the information from the maillinglist that this patch for libaqbanking > 4.x is nessarry. Or Gnucash version > 2.3.2 (unstable).

This is bugreport for gnucash: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582048

Please add this patch for Ubuntu 9.10.

[Saivann Carignan (oxmosys)]

Can you test the patch, and if it fixes the problem, can you follow these steps to create a debdiff and request sponsorship from ubuntu developers?

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess

[Norbert (asterix52)]

I tried the patch and it works.

[Saivann Carignan (oxmosys)]

Thanks! You forgot to subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors, I did it for you.

[Micha Lenk (micha)]

From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue :
# The Status should be "Confirmed" for bugs that represent a new candidate revision (e.g. bugfix uploads, merges.) In other words, use Status "Confirmed" when you have uploaded a debdiff that requires attention from a sponsor.

[Daniel Holbach (dholbach)]

Please make use of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines next time - I added the necessary information before uploading.

[Daniel Holbach (dholbach)]

You forgot to add (LP: #426685) to the entry in debian/changelog - else the bug would have been automatically closed.

[Norbert (asterix52)]

The new version work fine.

Thanks.