No x86_64 package available

Bug #712296 reported by Psychcf
16
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnu-smalltalk

There's no x86_64 package of this for the latest version of Ubuntu. There's an i386 version, but no x86_64.

Revision history for this message
Chow Loong Jin (hyperair) wrote :

It looks like it builds just fine on my natty sbuild, so can we have the build retried?

Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Triaged
Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Please test proposed package

Accepted gnu-smalltalk into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Will copy maverick-proposed to natty once it built.

Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Roland Plüss (rpluess) wrote :

What is the status on this one here? I see fix committed (whatever this means) but it does not look like the amd64 version is available. Using https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed as proposed on a mailing list does also not contain a amd64 testing version.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :
tags: added: verification-failed
removed: verification-needed
Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Fix Committed → Triaged
Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Roland Plüss (rpluess) wrote :

That's very strange. This test did before not fail on this one. Somebody added a broken patch? It builds all fine on GenToo so it has to be a patch of some sort. (version 3.2.3 there)

Revision history for this message
Psychcf (psychcf) wrote :

Ok, so any news on this, or was this bug forgotten about?

Revision history for this message
Roland Plüss (rpluess) wrote :

Most probably forgotten. There is still no x86_64 package and I really don't get why a package should keep on failing on Ubuntu 64bit if I'm running it here since ages on my GenToo 64bit machine. This just doesn't go into my brain. What please can be different on Ubuntu than GenToo? And how can it be "only" the 64bit version is affected?

Revision history for this message
Roland Plüss (rpluess) wrote :

Upgraded to natty today and gnu-smalltalk is STILL not in there. Didn't you claim it worked on natty? Why the hell is it STILL not working? Come on... it can't be so difficult. Other distros have it working like since 2 years and Ubuntu still fails at it? What's going on? Just that the GenToo ebuild and go from there if you can't do it on your own U_U

Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Natty):
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote :

I just tested building locally with sbuild and in a PPA (https://launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+archive/fixes/+packages) and it builds fine there.

I uploaded it to natty-proposed. If it fails again on buildd's, I'll investigate further what the failing test does.

Revision history for this message
Roland Plüss (rpluess) wrote :

Build it here on my natty too. There is a little problem with libtool as it fails building on libc.la located in the gnu-smalltalk source directory. Removing this file and running make again works. Seems to be libtool messing things up for some reason. Without that little problem though it builds fine, checks run fine and it runs fine here.

Revision history for this message
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote :

FYI a new version (and hopefully, an amd64 package being built) is blocked in oneiric on libsigsegv syncing from debian unstable, which I assume will happen as soon as auto-syncing w/ debian unstable is enabled.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Please also fix this in oneiric, so that this can progress to -updates.

Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
tags: removed: verification-failed
tags: added: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Accepted gnu-smalltalk into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

Revision history for this message
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote :

A new version is in Oneiric, I believe its been waiting for a dependency to sync... once it does we can mark thsi Fix Released.

Revision history for this message
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote :

Seems like the test suite is a little flaky. I just noticed it failed here the first time:

116: GDBM FAILED (testsuite.at:154)

But on retry, all tests passed (for 3.2-1build2 in maverick-proposed). So please give it a shot -proposed testers. :)

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :
Changed in gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Roland Plüss (rpluess) wrote :

I don't want to nag but what the hell is goin on? Still no GST 64bit on natty? It can't be that difficult! Multiple people build it from sources fine... U_U

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Anyone who can test the maverick-proposed update?

Revision history for this message
Adolfo Jayme Barrientos (fitojb) wrote :

obody tested the proposed package, but now it won't be released; therefore removing release nominations

no longer affects: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Maverick)
no longer affects: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu Natty)
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.