Comment 13 for bug 1229572

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package gnu-efi - 3.0u+debian-1ubuntu2~12.04.0

---------------
gnu-efi (3.0u+debian-1ubuntu2~12.04.0) precise; urgency=low

  * Backport gnu-efi from saucy to precise to support new versions of
    shim. LP: #1229572.

gnu-efi (3.0u+debian-1ubuntu2) saucy; urgency=low

  * debian/patches/gcc46-compatibility: don't break with old compilers
    and -DGNU_EFI_USE_MS_ABI.

gnu-efi (3.0u+debian-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian experimental, remaining changes:
    - pass architecture arguments when building the x86_64 code on i386
  * Dropped changes, included upstream:
    - build with -fno-stack-protector.

gnu-efi (3.0u+debian-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * Merging upstream version 3.0u+debian (Closes: #712639).
  * Dropping no-stack-protector.patch, included upstream.

gnu-efi (3.0t+debian-2) experimental; urgency=low

  * Dropping suggests on elilo.

gnu-efi (3.0t+debian-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * Merging upstream version 3.0t+debian.
  * Updating year in copyright file.
  * Refreshing no-stack-protector.patch.

gnu-efi (3.0s+debian-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Removing all references to my old email address.

gnu-efi (3.0s+debian-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Adding no-stack-protector.patch from Colin Watson
    <email address hidden> to make other packages being able to link
    against gnu-efi.
  * Dropping dpkg-source compression levels.
  * Adding dpkg-source local-options.

gnu-efi (3.0s+debian-1ubuntu2) raring; urgency=low

  * Restore -fno-stack-protector; this is needed to build packages linked
    against gnu-efi, such as efilinux. This change is now in a patch with a
    header explaining the reasoning, to try to avoid it being dropped in
    future.

gnu-efi (3.0s+debian-1ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian unstable, dropped changes:
    - gnuefi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds: align the .reloc section; merged upstream.
    - Build with -fno-stack-protector; no longer needed.
  * debian/rules: past architecture arguments when building the x86_64 code on
    i386; otherwise the upstream build system wrongly assumes that if uname
    says x86_64, it doesn't have to pass -m64 to the compiler.

gnu-efi (3.0s+debian-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Merging upstream version 3.0s+debian.

gnu-efi (3.0r+debian-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * Merging upstream version 3.0r+debian (Closes: #637276, #679627):
    - Rebuilding upstream tarball without debian directory.
  * Removing useless whitespaces at EOL and EOF.
  * Updating package to debhelper version 9.
  * Updating package to standards version 3.9.4.
  * Making build-depends on binutils unversioned, already fulfilled by
    wheezy.
  * Sorting architectures in gcc-multilib build-depends alphabetically.
  * Wrapping build-depends to 80 chars per line.
  * Adding homepage field.
  * Sorting architectures field alphabetically.
  * Removing pre-wheezy conflicts on libc6-i386.
  * Removing French spacing in package long-description.
  * Rewriting copyright file in copyright-format version 1.0.
  * Prefixing debhelper files with package name.
  * Simplifying debhelper docs file by using wildcard.
  * Removing watch file.
  * Reorganizing rules file in minimized debhelper form.
  * Switching to source format 3.0 (quilt).
  * Switching to xz compression.
  * Adding todo file.

gnu-efi (3.0i-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Updating maintainers and uploaders fields:
    - Removing Julien from uploaders, he resigned from the project
      (Closes: #688546).
    - Removing Bdale from uploaders as he wished.
    - Adding myself as maintainer.

gnu-efi (3.0i-3ubuntu2) quantal; urgency=low

  * gnuefi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds: align the .reloc section; otherwise the
    generated binaries may not validate correctly with Secure Boot.
 -- Steve Langasek <email address hidden> Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:21:08 -0700