[apport] flegita crashed with SIGSEGV in gsb_scanner_get_geometry()

Bug #104755 reported by Etana Nagy Péter
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnomescan (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Medium
Étienne BERSAC

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnomescan

flegita crashed when started

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Apr 9 13:23:42 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/flegita
Package: flegita 0.4.0.4-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: flegita
ProcCwd: /home/enp
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
 LANG=hu_HU.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnomescan
StacktraceTop:
 gsb_scanner_get_geometry () from /usr/lib/libgnomescan.so.0
 gsb_scanner_new () from /usr/lib/libgnomescan.so.0
 gnome_scan_backend_probe_scanners ()
 gnome_scan_context_probe_scanners ()
 gnome_scan_dialog_run () from /usr/lib/libgnomescanui.so.0
Uname: Linux elnino 2.6.20-14-generic #2 SMP Mon Apr 2 20:37:49 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin plugdev scanner video

Revision history for this message
Etana Nagy Péter (enp) wrote :
Changed in gnomescan:
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:gsb_scanner_new (backend=0x804f578, sid=0x838eea8, error=0xbfa6b508) at gnomescanbackend.c:601
gnome_scan_backend_probe_scanners (backend=0x804f578, error=0xbfa6b508) at gnomescanbackend.c:415
gnome_scan_context_probe_scanners (context=0x8054aa0) at gnomescancontext.c:616
gnome_scan_dialog_run (dialog=0x80b6000) at gnomescandialog.c:518

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :

Hi,

Thanks for the bug report. Please build gnomescan 0.4 with ./configure --enable-debugging and send the output.

Note that Étienne is developing a rewrite of gnomescan: gnome-scan 0.5 so the bug won't be fixed for 0.4, but if you want to help building a rocking sane frontend implementation, send the debugging output.

Revision history for this message
Étienne BERSAC (bersace) wrote :

Philipp is totaly right :)

Changed in gnomescan:
assignee: nobody → bersace
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

Is this still an issue in lucid or maverick?

Changed in gnomescan (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.