gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()

Bug #910321 reported by Vibhav Pant
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I was uploading a package to my PPA and chatting on irssi, I minimized this window for some time and on maximizing , it crashed

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: gnome-terminal 3.0.1-0ubuntu3
Uname: Linux 3.1.1 i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Dec 31 14:10:53 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-terminal
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012)
ProcCmdline: gnome-terminal
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb6f11aca <g_object_notify+42>: cmpl $0x50,(%eax)
 PC (0xb6f11aca) ok
 source "$0x50" ok
 destination "(%eax)" (0x00000008) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
StacktraceTop:
 g_object_notify () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-3.so.0
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Vibhav Pant (vibhavp) wrote :
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #864813, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.