gnome-terminal-server crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

Bug #1724983 reported by Alex
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

crashed few seconds after opening. It was inactive that time. I've just updated from 17.4. Dell XPS13 3960

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: gnome-terminal 3.24.2-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-lowlatency 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Oct 19 23:07:26 2017
DistributionChannelDescriptor:
 # This is a distribution channel descriptor
 # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
 canonical-oem-somerville-xenial-amd64-20160624-2
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-terminal/gnome-terminal-server
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-11-18 (335 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 "Xenial" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 20160624-10:47
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gnome-terminal/gnome-terminal-server
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f94dedac77e <g_type_check_instance_is_a+62>: testb $0x4,0x16(%rdx)
 PC (0x7f94dedac77e) ok
 source "$0x4" ok
 destination "0x16(%rdx)" (0x70000001e) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_check_instance_is_a () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 gtk_widget_get_toplevel () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
 gtk_window_group_add_window () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
 gtk_window_set_transient_for () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
Title: gnome-terminal-server crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2017-10-19 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip docker lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers

Revision history for this message
Alex (alex-golonzovsky) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1438014, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.