Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

Bug #1926104 reported by Pentarctagon
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned
wesnoth-1.14 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Wesnoth is not under a proprietary license and should not be listed as such in the Ubuntu software center.

Tags: hirsute
Revision history for this message
Hans Joachim Desserud (hjd) wrote :

Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and making Ubuntu better.

I can confirm that wesnoth-1.14 is wrongly listed with proprietary license in Ubuntu Software on Ubuntu 21.04. I remember seeing reports for other open source packages also listed with wrong license, but I don't know if there's a common root cause for these.

Btw, when reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and the name of the package affected. This will automatically add information such as version numbers. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

Changed in wesnoth-1.14 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
tags: added: hirsute
Changed in gnome-software (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Rhonda D'Vine (rhonda) wrote :

I have no clue how that is chosen. Where does that come from, is there something within the package to do, because I wouldn't know how the software center decides that. I rather thinkt his might be something within software center to explain why it thinks so, for now I have no clue how to adjust that.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :

How does the `project_license` tag in Wesnoths AppStream MetaInfo file look like? Because that's the thing that is looked at to determine whether the license is free.

Revision history for this message
Rhonda D'Vine (rhonda) wrote :

There is no appstream metainfo file installed (so far, I noticed that upstream ships one so I'll install it in the future). Finding that out was quite a huge digging around, it's not well documented or visible.

The package though is in Debian main/Ubuntu Universe, and thus implicitly is clearly free software. So the software center not recognising those sections seems to be a flaw in the way the software center tags packages where it can't find a metainfo file.

Changed in wesnoth-1.14 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package wesnoth-1.14 - 1:1.14.17-2

---------------
wesnoth-1.14 (1:1.14.17-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Install appstream metainfo file (LP: #1926104)

 -- Rhonda D'Vine <email address hidden> Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:19:46 +0200

Changed in wesnoth-1.14 (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.