gnome-software crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()

Bug #1723160 reported by Alex GOOD HEARTS Organisation
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-software (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Tried to install ufw snap twice - same result: crash. Have no idea why. What can be a fix? Or should I use a different simple firewall for my ubuntu 17.10? Thanks

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: gnome-software 3.26.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-15.16-generic 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-15-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Oct 12 18:22:19 2017
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-software
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-06 (6 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Beta amd64 (20171004)
InstalledPlugins:
 gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
 gnome-software-plugin-limba N/A
 gnome-software-plugin-snap 3.26.1-0ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/gnome-software --gapplication-service
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f35a6d61a10: mov 0x20(%rdi),%eax
 PC (0x7f35a6d61a10) ok
 source "0x20(%rdi)" (0x00000020) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-software
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_builder_add_value () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_new_va () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_new () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-software crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Alex GOOD HEARTS Organisation (ask-alex) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1722964, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.