gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #667180 reported by Gabor Toth
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon

In Ubuntu 10.10
Suddenly a crash report came up as attached.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gnome-settings-daemon 2.32.0-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
CheckboxSubmission: f961e9300df6c44dac04bec829ca2de6
CheckboxSystem: 7e7121b1f5758c5838b4fcbec0847b38
Date: Wed Oct 27 03:35:06 2010
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_DK.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x204f4b: movsbl (%edx),%eax
 PC (0x00204f4b) ok
 source "(%edx)" (0x535f4d57) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-settings-daemon
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1770): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (nautilus:1757): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value != NULL' failed

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #641120, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.