"Computer will suspend very soon because of inactivity." dialog when resuming from suspend
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOME Settings Daemon |
Unknown
|
Medium
|
|||
gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
After upgrading to 13.10 today, every time I unlock my computer after leaving it for a long time I get this prompt:
--
Power
Automatic suspend
Computer will suspend very soon because of inactivity.
--
However, the computer doesn't actually suspend.
And even if I do this manually (which works) and then resume, the prompt is still there (and in that case, not true at all).
This is ugly and seems broken!
As suggested by the upstream Gnome bug report, this is an issue pertaining to Ubuntu's lack of systemd integration.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: ubuntu-desktop 1.304
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-8-generic i686
NonfreeKernelMo
ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Sep 28 15:32:42 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-08-03 (420 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423)
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: ubuntu-meta
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-09-28 (0 days ago)
summary: |
- Often automatic suspend when I unlock + Often automatic suspend dialog when I unlock |
Changed in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
Changed in gnome-settings-daemon: | |
importance: | Unknown → Medium |
status: | Unknown → Incomplete |
summary: |
- Often automatic suspend dialog when I unlock + "Computer will suspend very soon because of inactivity." dialog when + resuming from suspend |
Changed in gnome-settings-daemon: | |
status: | Incomplete → Unknown |
description: | updated |
Changed my settings under power in system settings, now the computer did actually suspend but still, the message should not be there IMHO after resume from suspend.
A simple notification saying the computer did suspend previously would be sufficient (or nothing at all as before 13.10).