On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Scott Wegner <email address hidden> wrote:
> After looking into the stack-trace and such, it looks
> to be a duplicate of bug #214079, which already has a reported fix. Let
> me know if you would like to report a new bug anyway, and I can.
>
When in doubt, do, and Apport will automatically mark it as a duplicate once
it retraces it. I'd say do it, err on the side of redundancy. :)
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Scott Wegner <email address hidden> wrote:
> After looking into the stack-trace and such, it looks
> to be a duplicate of bug #214079, which already has a reported fix. Let
> me know if you would like to report a new bug anyway, and I can.
>
When in doubt, do, and Apport will automatically mark it as a duplicate once
it retraces it. I'd say do it, err on the side of redundancy. :)