Ping from Network Tools shows packetloss even though it works

Bug #705610 reported by Thomas Novin
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #663014: No result for ping in Gnome-Nettool. Edit Remove
26
This bug affects 5 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-nettool (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnome-nettool

Just by coincidence I tried using Ping from Administration > Network Tools.

It doesn't work! It says that I cannot ping anything, even though it works just fine if I do it in a terminal. I can also see with tcpdump that ping from this tool actually does work and nice replies are received also.

Ping from terminal + tcpdump:

$ ping -c 5 www.du.se
PING neon.du.se (130.243.57.245) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from neon.du.se (130.243.57.245): icmp_req=1 ttl=117 time=22.1 ms
64 bytes from neon.du.se (130.243.57.245): icmp_req=2 ttl=117 time=22.5 ms
64 bytes from neon.du.se (130.243.57.245): icmp_req=3 ttl=117 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from neon.du.se (130.243.57.245): icmp_req=4 ttl=117 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from neon.du.se (130.243.57.245): icmp_req=5 ttl=117 time=22.3 ms

--- neon.du.se ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.119/22.342/22.500/0.123 ms

$ sudo tcpdump -i eth0 -nv icmp -c 5
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
21:54:47.271593 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    217.210.11.124 > 130.243.57.245: ICMP echo request, id 21409, seq 1, length 64
21:54:47.293692 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 117, id 31149, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    130.243.57.245 > 217.210.11.124: ICMP echo reply, id 21409, seq 1, length 64
21:54:48.273194 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    217.210.11.124 > 130.243.57.245: ICMP echo request, id 21409, seq 2, length 64
21:54:48.295670 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 117, id 32035, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    130.243.57.245 > 217.210.11.124: ICMP echo reply, id 21409, seq 2, length 64
21:54:49.275146 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    217.210.11.124 > 130.243.57.245: ICMP echo request, id 21409, seq 3, length 64
5 packets captured
5 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

tcpdump output when I do a ping from the Ping tab in Network Tools:

$ sudo tcpdump -i eth0 -nv icmp -c 5
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
21:55:41.266045 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    217.210.11.124 > 130.243.57.245: ICMP echo request, id 21454, seq 1, length 64
21:55:41.288631 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 117, id 1091, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    130.243.57.245 > 217.210.11.124: ICMP echo reply, id 21454, seq 1, length 64
21:55:42.267640 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    217.210.11.124 > 130.243.57.245: ICMP echo request, id 21454, seq 2, length 64
21:55:42.289662 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 117, id 2004, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    130.243.57.245 > 217.210.11.124: ICMP echo reply, id 21454, seq 2, length 64
21:55:43.268804 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
    217.210.11.124 > 130.243.57.245: ICMP echo request, id 21454, seq 3, length 64
5 packets captured
5 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

Also look at screenshot from this program (attached).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gnome-nettool 2.31.6-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Jan 20 21:50:41 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-nettool
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_DK.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-nettool

Revision history for this message
Thomas Novin (thomasn80) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Thomas Novin (thomasn80) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Don McCollum (don-mccollum) wrote :

Same problem here.

Revision history for this message
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) wrote :

This appears to be a duplicate of bug 663014

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.