Although I think prorprietary is more correct than commercial, still somtimes we do not put open source software directly into Ubuntu, e.g. libdvdcss. So why not just call it "third party"? We need to classify them this way simply because it does not come with ubuntu, right?
Although I think prorprietary is more correct than commercial, still somtimes we do not put open source software directly into Ubuntu, e.g. libdvdcss. So why not just call it "third party"? We need to classify them this way simply because it does not come with ubuntu, right?