glibc regressions on riscv64

[Matthias Klose]

building glibc in impish on an unmatched board shows the following regressions:

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
FAIL: math/test-double-asinh
FAIL: math/test-double-cbrt
FAIL: math/test-double-cosh
FAIL: math/test-double-exp
FAIL: math/test-double-log
FAIL: math/test-double-sinh
FAIL: math/test-double-tgamma
FAIL: math/test-float128-j0
FAIL: math/test-float32x-asinh
FAIL: math/test-float32x-cbrt
FAIL: math/test-float32x-cosh
FAIL: math/test-float32x-exp
FAIL: math/test-float32x-log
FAIL: math/test-float32x-sinh
FAIL: math/test-float32x-tgamma
FAIL: math/test-float64-asinh
FAIL: math/test-float64-cbrt
FAIL: math/test-float64-cosh
FAIL: math/test-float64-exp
FAIL: math/test-float64-log
FAIL: math/test-float64-sinh
FAIL: math/test-float64-tgamma
FAIL: math/test-float64x-j0
FAIL: math/test-ldouble-j0

[Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson)]

I guess https://patches-gcc.linaro.org/patch/57922/ will fix this?

[Heinrich Schuchardt (xypron)]

This bug report relates to glibc-2.33. But Impish was published glibc-2.34. The aforementioned patch is included in the 2.34 source. Please, close the issue.