libc-2.31.so segfaults

Bug #1926686 reported by Robert Dinse
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
glibc (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[510606.379044] lightdm[4046529]: segfault at 55007d2a3f8b ip 00007f7260003f0b sp 00007fffbb5a0600 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f725ff8e000+178000]

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lightdm 1.30.0-0ubuntu4~20.04.1
Uname: Linux 5.10.32 x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Thu Apr 29 20:55:18 2021
SourcePackage: lightdm
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Robert Dinse (nanook) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

Thanks for your report!

Since you use lightdm 1.30.0-0ubuntu4~20.04.1 from focal-proposed, can you please downgrade to version 1.30.0-0ubuntu3.1 and let us know if it makes a difference.

Changed in lightdm (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Robert Dinse (nanook) wrote :

Ok, I've installed the old version to see if this occurs, this was not a frequent problem with this version so I'm unlikely to have an answer overnight. However, I was under the impression that the purpose of proposed was to test and get feedback and fix such things before it entered mainstream.

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

On 2021-04-30 23:59, Robert Dinse wrote:
> I was under the impression that the purpose of proposed was to test
> and get feedback and fix such things before it entered mainstream.

It is, but such testing happens normally via dedicated bug reports. As regards the current lightdm version in -proposed that is bug #1921655.

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

OTOH... If you haven't enabled the guest session feature, the difference between the lightdm versions in focal-release and focal-proposed can't possibly cause the segfault.

Did you possibly install everything from focal-proposed? In that case you may be actually 'testing' this upload:

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.3

After all the error message includes "error 4 in libc-2.31.so".

Revision history for this message
Robert Dinse (nanook) wrote : Re: [Bug 1926686] Re: lightdm segfaults

     Yes, I have other things segfaulting with libc-2.31.so as well but
ubuntu-bug would not allow me to originate a bug report on a library.

On 4/30/21 4:39 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> OTOH... If you haven't enabled the guest session feature, the difference
> between the lightdm versions in focal-release and focal-proposed can't
> possibly cause the segfault.
>
> Did you possibly install everything from focal-proposed? In that case
> you may be actually 'testing' this upload:
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.3
>
> After all the error message includes "error 4 in libc-2.31.so".
>

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote : Re: lightdm segfaults

Right, bugs are filed against source packages. Changing.

affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) → glibc (Ubuntu)
Changed in glibc (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → New
summary: - lightdm segfaults
+ libc-2.31.so segfaults
Revision history for this message
Simon Chopin (schopin) wrote :

Hi,

Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay.

Sadly, as it is there is no way to solve the issue as we don't have a usable stack trace, thus marking as Incomplete. I'll be uploading a fix for bug 2001932 that solves a segfault, it *might* be the cause of your issues.

Changed in glibc (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for glibc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in glibc (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
Revision history for this message
Robert Dinse (nanook) wrote : Re: [Bug 1926686] Re: libc-2.31.so segfaults

Why fix when you can ignore?

On 7/30/23 21:17, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> [Expired for glibc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
> days.]
>
> ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Expired
>

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.