> so lets focus on pacemaker instead of glib2.0
sounds good - i will mark this as 'wont fix', but we can come back to it if needed.
Also note, the existing bug 1545308 appears to be the same as this.
> so lets focus on pacemaker instead of glib2.0
sounds good - i will mark this as 'wont fix', but we can come back to it if needed.
Also note, the existing bug 1545308 appears to be the same as this.