Activity log for bug #1936901

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2021-07-20 07:30:13 Christian Ehrhardt  bug added bug
2021-07-20 07:30:23 Christian Ehrhardt  tags update-excuse
2021-07-20 08:08:14 Christian Ehrhardt  description The current version 0.4.30 is FTBFS on s390x. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/1:0.4.30-1 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/1:0.4.30-1/+build/21795068 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/549105404/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-s390x.gegl_1%3A0.4.30-1_BUILDING.txt.gz It comes down to two tests which fail with SIGinvalid 118/249 gegl:composition / hdr_color FAIL 0.67s (exit status 250 or signal 122 SIGinvalid) 150/249 gegl:composition / rgb_params FAIL 0.67s (exit status 250 or signal 122 SIGinvalid) The errors are (still as of today) not showing up if we re-build / re-tests 0.4.28. The issue is reproducible on s390x in an impish container. There are plenty of tests that got added, the old code has 104 while the new one has 249. So we can't say "it worked in the former version" as that test wasn't present at all back then. Old: Ok: 103 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 0 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 1 Timeout: 0 New: Ok: 114 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 2 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 133 Timeout: 0 So plenty of the new additions got skipped, but not those two and they fail badly. The current version 0.4.30 is FTBFS on s390x.   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/1:0.4.30-1   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/1:0.4.30-1/+build/21795068   https://launchpadlibrarian.net/549105404/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-s390x.gegl_1%3A0.4.30-1_BUILDING.txt.gz It comes down to two tests which fail with SIGinvalid 118/249 gegl:composition / hdr_color FAIL 0.67s (exit status 250 or signal 122 SIGinvalid) 150/249 gegl:composition / rgb_params FAIL 0.67s (exit status 250 or signal 122 SIGinvalid) The errors are (still as of today) not showing up if we re-build / re-tests 0.4.28. The issue is reproducible on s390x in an impish container. There are plenty of tests that got added, the old code has 104 while the new one has 249. So we can't say "it worked in the former version" as that test wasn't present at all back then. Old: Ok: 103 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 0 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 1 Timeout: 0 New: Ok: 114 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 2 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 133 Timeout: 0 So plenty of the new additions got skipped, but not those two and they fail badly. FYI this is broken in Debian the very same way https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gegl&arch=s390x&ver=1%3A0.4.30-1&stamp=1626634928&raw=0
2021-07-20 09:08:37 Christian Ehrhardt  bug watch added https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gegl/-/issues/289
2021-07-20 09:08:37 Christian Ehrhardt  bug task added gegl
2021-07-20 09:49:46 Christian Ehrhardt  bug watch added https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991300
2021-07-20 09:49:54 Christian Ehrhardt  bug task added gegl (Debian)
2021-07-20 09:50:21 Christian Ehrhardt  gegl (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2021-07-20 10:39:33 Bug Watch Updater gegl (Debian): status Unknown New
2021-08-20 20:58:30 Bug Watch Updater gegl (Debian): status New Confirmed
2021-09-09 23:33:16 Jeremy Bícha gegl (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Fix Released
2021-09-10 11:04:06 Bug Watch Updater gegl (Debian): status Confirmed Fix Released
2022-05-20 15:59:10 Bug Watch Updater gegl: status Unknown Fix Released