Activity log for bug #577919

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2010-05-09 17:52:12 lipstick bug added bug
2010-05-09 17:52:12 lipstick attachment added Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48153992/Dependencies.txt
2010-06-09 12:28:36 Marc Deslauriers affects chromium-browser (Ubuntu) gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu)
2010-06-09 12:28:52 Marc Deslauriers tags apport-bug i386 lucid apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid
2010-06-09 17:23:58 Marc Deslauriers gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2010-06-09 17:24:05 Marc Deslauriers gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Low
2010-07-25 23:46:07 Chris Williams bug task added openvz-kernel
2010-07-25 23:49:20 Chris Williams bug added subscriber Chris Williams
2010-07-30 12:24:13 John Baptist bug added subscriber John Baptist
2010-08-20 13:48:31 Daniel Hahler bug watch added http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=31077
2010-08-20 13:48:31 Daniel Hahler bug task added chromium-browser
2010-08-20 13:53:17 Daniel Hahler bug added subscriber Daniel Hahler
2010-08-20 13:53:23 Daniel Hahler openvz-kernel: status New Confirmed
2010-08-20 13:56:02 Daniel Hahler summary chromium-browser can't open when the guest account is activated chromium-browser fails to start (guest account, OpenVZ): "Failed to move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted"
2010-11-08 21:59:09 Evan Martin (Chromium) bug watch added http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=62248
2011-02-14 09:29:56 Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon bug added subscriber Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
2011-12-16 04:04:58 CPKS bug added subscriber CPKS
2012-03-19 16:04:08 Colan Schwartz bug added subscriber Colan Schwartz
2012-04-24 02:57:48 Colan Schwartz tags apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric precise
2012-05-13 01:35:14 Ugur Aslan bug added subscriber Ugur Aslan
2012-08-27 21:16:10 jeremiejig attachment added attempt to fix the bug (not working) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm-guest-session/+bug/577919/+attachment/3279672/+files/lightdm-guest-session
2012-08-27 21:46:38 jeremiejig gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu): assignee jeremiejig (pauljiang)
2012-08-27 22:20:39 jeremiejig attachment added apparmor profile for guest-session fixed for chromium launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm-guest-session/+bug/577919/+attachment/3279749/+files/lightdm-guest-session
2012-08-27 22:22:52 jeremiejig gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu): assignee jeremiejig (pauljiang)
2012-08-28 00:25:03 Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot tags amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric precise amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric patch precise
2012-08-28 00:25:14 Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot bug added subscriber Ubuntu Review Team
2012-08-28 14:24:43 jeremiejig bug task added lightdm
2012-08-28 14:28:49 Launchpad Janitor lightdm (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2012-08-28 14:28:49 jeremiejig affects lightdm lightdm (Ubuntu)
2012-08-28 14:39:21 jeremiejig lightdm (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2012-08-28 16:10:43 jeremiejig lightdm (Ubuntu): status Confirmed In Progress
2012-08-28 16:10:43 jeremiejig lightdm (Ubuntu): assignee jeremiejig (pauljiang)
2012-08-28 16:11:31 jeremiejig affects lightdm (Ubuntu) lightdm
2012-08-28 22:02:44 jeremiejig attachment added fix the bug in a more clean way https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm-guest-session/+bug/577919/+attachment/3281213/+files/lightdm_bugfix.tar.gz
2012-08-28 22:04:43 jeremiejig lightdm: assignee jeremiejig (pauljiang)
2012-10-01 11:41:07 Marc Deslauriers bug task added lightdm (Ubuntu)
2012-10-01 11:41:15 Marc Deslauriers lightdm (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2012-10-01 11:41:20 Marc Deslauriers lightdm (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Medium
2012-10-01 16:48:18 Jamie Strandboge lightdm (Ubuntu): assignee Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
2012-10-01 16:48:21 Jamie Strandboge lightdm (Ubuntu): status Confirmed In Progress
2012-10-01 17:50:02 Jamie Strandboge bug task added lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu)
2012-10-01 17:50:16 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu): status New Triaged
2012-10-01 17:50:16 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu): assignee Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
2012-10-01 17:50:36 Jamie Strandboge bug task added lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu)
2012-10-01 17:50:51 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu): status New Triaged
2012-10-01 17:50:51 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu): assignee Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
2012-10-01 18:05:20 Ugur Aslan removed subscriber Ugur Aslan
2012-10-01 18:37:52 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu): status Triaged In Progress
2012-10-01 18:49:22 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu): status Triaged In Progress
2012-10-01 19:39:02 Jamie Strandboge lightdm (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Committed
2012-10-01 19:39:05 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Committed
2012-10-01 19:39:07 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Committed
2012-10-01 19:54:12 Launchpad Janitor lightdm (Ubuntu): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2012-10-01 19:57:11 Launchpad Janitor lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2012-10-01 19:58:10 Launchpad Janitor lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2012-10-01 20:14:42 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/lightdm
2012-10-01 20:16:03 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/lightdm-remote-session-freerdp
2012-10-01 20:18:23 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure
2012-10-15 11:32:38 Adolfo Jayme Barrientos bug added subscriber Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
2012-11-24 13:04:18 Hendrik Schrieber bug added subscriber Hendrik Knackstedt
2013-02-11 21:33:14 Robert Ancell lightdm: status In Progress Triaged
2013-02-11 21:33:16 Robert Ancell lightdm: importance Undecided Medium
2013-02-11 21:38:50 Robert Ancell lightdm: status Triaged Fix Committed
2013-02-11 21:38:52 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:lightdm
2013-03-27 02:19:41 Robert Ancell lightdm: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2013-03-29 13:56:00 Hendrik Schrieber description Binary package hint: chromium-browser When i opened my guest account to let my friend to use the computer, he couldn't run chromium-browser. But it works ok when my user account is activated ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) ProcEnviron: LANG=tr_TR.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser Binary package hint: chromium-browser [Impact] Chromium-browser does not launch from guest session. Fix by Jamie Strandboge: "It would be nice if AppArmor could merge profiles, but we can't yet, so we need to do like you initially did: have two mostly identical profiles. Because the lightdm remote sessions are shipping policy copies, the maintenance cost is getting high. I will be abstracting out the guest rules into abstracations/lightdm and then have a small snippet using a child profile in abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser. The guest and remote lightdm profiles can just include these and all the policy is in the abstractions. Using a lightdm.d directory is a good idea, but upstream AppArmor is currently discussing how to best handle .d directories like this, and I'd rather not add another one until that discussions is finished." [Test Case] Login to the guest account after booting in Ubuntu Precise and try to run Chromium-browser. [Regression Potential] Upstream work on AppArmor was considered here and a child profile was added not touching the other policies so the regression potential is pretty low. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) ProcEnviron:  LANG=tr_TR.utf8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser
2013-03-29 14:08:14 Hendrik Schrieber bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2013-03-29 14:09:44 Hendrik Schrieber tags amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric patch precise amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric patch precise verification-needed
2013-06-11 16:14:17 Jamie Strandboge nominated for series Ubuntu Precise
2013-06-11 16:14:17 Jamie Strandboge bug task added gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu Precise)
2013-06-11 16:14:17 Jamie Strandboge bug task added lightdm (Ubuntu Precise)
2013-06-11 16:14:17 Jamie Strandboge bug task added lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu Precise)
2013-06-11 16:14:17 Jamie Strandboge bug task added lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu Precise)
2013-06-11 16:14:41 Jamie Strandboge lightdm (Ubuntu Precise): status New In Progress
2013-06-11 16:14:41 Jamie Strandboge lightdm (Ubuntu Precise): assignee Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
2013-06-11 16:15:01 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu Precise): status New Invalid
2013-06-11 16:15:16 Jamie Strandboge lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu Precise): status New Invalid
2013-06-11 16:54:31 Jamie Strandboge description Binary package hint: chromium-browser [Impact] Chromium-browser does not launch from guest session. Fix by Jamie Strandboge: "It would be nice if AppArmor could merge profiles, but we can't yet, so we need to do like you initially did: have two mostly identical profiles. Because the lightdm remote sessions are shipping policy copies, the maintenance cost is getting high. I will be abstracting out the guest rules into abstracations/lightdm and then have a small snippet using a child profile in abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser. The guest and remote lightdm profiles can just include these and all the policy is in the abstractions. Using a lightdm.d directory is a good idea, but upstream AppArmor is currently discussing how to best handle .d directories like this, and I'd rather not add another one until that discussions is finished." [Test Case] Login to the guest account after booting in Ubuntu Precise and try to run Chromium-browser. [Regression Potential] Upstream work on AppArmor was considered here and a child profile was added not touching the other policies so the regression potential is pretty low. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) ProcEnviron:  LANG=tr_TR.utf8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser Binary package hint: chromium-browser [Impact] Chromium-browser does not launch from guest session. Fix by Jamie Strandboge: "It would be nice if AppArmor could merge profiles, but we can't yet, so we need to do like you initially did: have two mostly identical profiles. Because the lightdm remote sessions are shipping policy copies, the maintenance cost is getting high. I will be abstracting out the guest rules into abstracations/lightdm and then have a small snippet using a child profile in abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser. The guest and remote lightdm profiles can just include these and all the policy is in the abstractions. Using a lightdm.d directory is a good idea, but upstream AppArmor is currently discussing how to best handle .d directories like this, and I'd rather not add another one until that discussions is finished." [Test Case] 1. install chromium-browser 2. login to the guest account 3. login to vt1 or login via ssh as a regular user and verify that the lightdm profile is loaded and guest session applications are confined: $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1378) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1414) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1417) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1418) ... Note: number of profiles and pids will vary. 4. try to start chromium-browser either via the Dash or a terminal Prior to upgrading, chromium-browser will fail to start with: Failed to move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted After upgrading, the guest session should be functional and chromium-browser should start. In addition, aa-status should report a child profile for chromium-browser and chromium-browser should be under that confinement: $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3090) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3092) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3093) ... [Regression Potential] As mentioned in the Impact, the apparmor profile for lightdm has necessarily been broken out into multiple parts. As such, there is potential that the guest session profile won't work correctly, however, this is easily seen in the test cases and these changes have been in place since 12.10. [Other Info] Attached is a debdiff for 12.04. It: - adds debian/patches/05_lp577919-fix-chromium-launch.patch which is the same as debian/patches/09_lp577919-fix-chromium-launch.patch from quantal, except it a) does not include the fix for bug #1059510, which is uneeded on precise and b) includes the fix for bug #1189948 to install the abstractions with the correct permissions - additionally, debian/lightdm.postinst is updated to reload the apparmor profile on upgrade to this version of lightdm. The code in question uses the same logic as dh_apparmor, and I'm not sure why lightdm doesn't use dh_apparmor. Rather than making several packaging changes to use dh_apparmor, I chose this option to reduce change. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) ProcEnviron:  LANG=tr_TR.utf8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser
2013-06-11 16:54:52 Jamie Strandboge gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu Precise): status New Won't Fix
2013-06-11 16:55:33 Jamie Strandboge attachment added lightdm_1.2.3-0ubuntu2.2.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/gdm-guest-session/+bug/577919/+attachment/3700993/+files/lightdm_1.2.3-0ubuntu2.2.debdiff
2013-06-11 16:57:14 Jamie Strandboge description Binary package hint: chromium-browser [Impact] Chromium-browser does not launch from guest session. Fix by Jamie Strandboge: "It would be nice if AppArmor could merge profiles, but we can't yet, so we need to do like you initially did: have two mostly identical profiles. Because the lightdm remote sessions are shipping policy copies, the maintenance cost is getting high. I will be abstracting out the guest rules into abstracations/lightdm and then have a small snippet using a child profile in abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser. The guest and remote lightdm profiles can just include these and all the policy is in the abstractions. Using a lightdm.d directory is a good idea, but upstream AppArmor is currently discussing how to best handle .d directories like this, and I'd rather not add another one until that discussions is finished." [Test Case] 1. install chromium-browser 2. login to the guest account 3. login to vt1 or login via ssh as a regular user and verify that the lightdm profile is loaded and guest session applications are confined: $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1378) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1414) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1417) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1418) ... Note: number of profiles and pids will vary. 4. try to start chromium-browser either via the Dash or a terminal Prior to upgrading, chromium-browser will fail to start with: Failed to move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted After upgrading, the guest session should be functional and chromium-browser should start. In addition, aa-status should report a child profile for chromium-browser and chromium-browser should be under that confinement: $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3090) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3092) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3093) ... [Regression Potential] As mentioned in the Impact, the apparmor profile for lightdm has necessarily been broken out into multiple parts. As such, there is potential that the guest session profile won't work correctly, however, this is easily seen in the test cases and these changes have been in place since 12.10. [Other Info] Attached is a debdiff for 12.04. It: - adds debian/patches/05_lp577919-fix-chromium-launch.patch which is the same as debian/patches/09_lp577919-fix-chromium-launch.patch from quantal, except it a) does not include the fix for bug #1059510, which is uneeded on precise and b) includes the fix for bug #1189948 to install the abstractions with the correct permissions - additionally, debian/lightdm.postinst is updated to reload the apparmor profile on upgrade to this version of lightdm. The code in question uses the same logic as dh_apparmor, and I'm not sure why lightdm doesn't use dh_apparmor. Rather than making several packaging changes to use dh_apparmor, I chose this option to reduce change. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) ProcEnviron:  LANG=tr_TR.utf8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser Binary package hint: chromium-browser [Impact] Chromium-browser does not launch from guest session. Fix by Jamie Strandboge: "It would be nice if AppArmor could merge profiles, but we can't yet, so we need to do like you initially did: have two mostly identical profiles. Because the lightdm remote sessions are shipping policy copies, the maintenance cost is getting high. I will be abstracting out the guest rules into abstracations/lightdm and then have a small snippet using a child profile in abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser. The guest and remote lightdm profiles can just include these and all the policy is in the abstractions. Using a lightdm.d directory is a good idea, but upstream AppArmor is currently discussing how to best handle .d directories like this, and I'd rather not add another one until that discussions is finished." [Test Case] 1. install chromium-browser 2. login to the guest account 3. login to vt1 or login via ssh as a regular user and verify that the lightdm profile    is loaded and guest session applications are confined: $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. ...    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper ...    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1378)    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1414)    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1417)    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (1418) ... Note: number of profiles and pids will vary. 4. try to start chromium-browser either via the Dash or a terminal Prior to upgrading, chromium-browser will fail to start with: Failed to move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted After upgrading, the guest session should be functional and chromium-browser should start. In addition, aa-status should report a child profile for chromium-browser and chromium-browser should be under that confinement with other guest session applications under the lightdm-guest-session-wrapper confinement: $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. ...    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser ... /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (2667) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (2672) /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper (2682) ...    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3090)    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3092)    /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper//chromium_browser (3093) ... [Regression Potential] As mentioned in the Impact, the apparmor profile for lightdm has necessarily been broken out into multiple parts. As such, there is potential that the guest session profile won't work correctly, however, this is easily seen in the test cases and these changes have been in place since 12.10. [Other Info] Attached is a debdiff for 12.04. It:  - adds debian/patches/05_lp577919-fix-chromium-launch.patch which is the same as    debian/patches/09_lp577919-fix-chromium-launch.patch from quantal, except it a)    does not include the fix for bug #1059510, which is uneeded on precise and b)    includes the fix for bug #1189948 to install the abstractions with the correct    permissions  - additionally, debian/lightdm.postinst is updated to reload the apparmor profile    on upgrade to this version of lightdm. The code in question uses the same logic    as dh_apparmor, and I'm not sure why lightdm doesn't use dh_apparmor. Rather than    making several packaging changes to use dh_apparmor, I chose this option to reduce    change. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) ProcEnviron:  LANG=tr_TR.utf8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chromium-browser
2013-06-20 21:32:33 Brian Murray lightdm (Ubuntu Precise): status In Progress Fix Committed
2013-06-20 21:32:39 Brian Murray bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2013-06-22 10:06:13 Hendrik Schrieber tags amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric patch precise verification-needed amd64 apparmor apport-bug i386 lucid oneiric patch precise verification-done
2013-07-01 13:33:23 Colin Watson removed subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2013-07-01 13:55:40 Launchpad Janitor lightdm (Ubuntu Precise): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2013-07-15 06:28:25 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/lightdm
2013-07-25 14:34:08 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/precise-updates/lightdm