Activity log for bug #1879481

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2020-05-19 10:46:24 Matthias Klose bug added bug
2020-05-19 10:46:37 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-9 (Ubuntu)
2020-05-19 10:46:50 Matthias Klose nominated for series Ubuntu Focal
2020-05-19 10:46:50 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal)
2020-05-19 10:46:50 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-10 (Ubuntu Focal)
2020-08-22 11:04:59 Launchpad Janitor gcc-10 (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2020-08-22 11:04:59 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9 (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2020-08-22 11:04:59 Launchpad Janitor gcc-10 (Ubuntu Focal): status New Confirmed
2020-08-22 11:04:59 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal): status New Confirmed
2020-09-04 10:03:32 Matthias Klose description As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.1.0 release. - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.1.0 release - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time of the gcc-10 release. - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.1, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch FIXME: update after the test rebuild is done. [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20191107-bionic-bionic.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20191107-bionic-gcc7-bionic.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. There are no additional regressions except for one Python test, which sometimes hangs on the buildds, sometimes passes (test_ttk_guionly). Will be disabled in a follow-up upload. As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.1.0 release.  - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.1.0 release  - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time    of the gcc-10 release.  - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.1, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch FIXME: update after the test rebuild is done. [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which was fixed by a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not checked for any regressions.
2020-09-04 10:07:12 Matthias Klose description As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.1.0 release.  - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.1.0 release  - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time    of the gcc-10 release.  - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.1, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch FIXME: update after the test rebuild is done. [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which was fixed by a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not checked for any regressions. As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.2.0 release.  - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.2.0 release  - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time    of the gcc-10 release.  - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.2, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which is unrelated to the GCC update, and which was fixed by a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not checked for any regressions.
2020-09-04 12:41:18 Łukasz Zemczak description As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.2.0 release.  - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.2.0 release  - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time    of the gcc-10 release.  - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.2, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which is unrelated to the GCC update, and which was fixed by a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not checked for any regressions. As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.2.0 release.  - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.2.0 release  - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time    of the gcc-10 release.  - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.2, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib-extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which is unrelated to the GCC update, and which was fixed by a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not checked for any regressions.
2020-09-04 13:21:23 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal): status Confirmed Fix Committed
2020-09-04 13:21:24 Łukasz Zemczak bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2020-09-04 13:21:26 Łukasz Zemczak bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2020-09-04 13:21:28 Łukasz Zemczak tags verification-needed verification-needed-focal
2020-09-04 13:22:36 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-10 (Ubuntu Focal): status Confirmed Fix Committed
2020-09-10 09:33:53 Matthias Klose tags verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-done verification-done-focal
2020-09-11 08:34:44 Alberto Milone attachment added libc6_386_failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/+bug/1879481/+attachment/5409672/+files/libc6_386_failure
2020-09-11 08:35:16 Alberto Milone tags verification-done verification-done-focal verification-failed-focal verification-needed
2020-09-17 12:51:02 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-10-cross (Ubuntu)
2020-09-17 12:51:16 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-10-cross-ports (Ubuntu)
2020-09-17 12:51:44 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-10-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu)
2020-09-17 12:51:55 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-9-cross (Ubuntu)
2020-09-17 12:52:08 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-9-cross-ports (Ubuntu)
2020-09-17 12:52:20 Matthias Klose bug task added gcc-9-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu)
2020-09-21 15:38:26 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-10-cross (Ubuntu Focal): status New Fix Committed
2020-09-21 15:38:31 Łukasz Zemczak tags verification-failed-focal verification-needed verification-needed verification-needed-focal
2020-09-21 15:53:49 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-10-cross-ports (Ubuntu Focal): status New Fix Committed
2020-09-21 16:18:18 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-9-cross (Ubuntu Focal): status New Fix Committed
2020-09-21 16:20:14 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-9-cross-ports (Ubuntu Focal): status New Fix Committed
2020-09-22 07:36:49 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-10-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu Focal): status New Fix Committed
2020-09-24 15:25:29 Łukasz Zemczak gcc-9-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu Focal): status New Fix Committed
2020-09-25 10:13:48 Matthias Klose tags verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-done verification-done-focal
2020-10-07 11:42:05 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:42:03 Launchpad Janitor gcc-10 (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:42:21 Launchpad Janitor gcc-10-cross (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:42:48 Launchpad Janitor gcc-10-cross-ports (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:43:23 Launchpad Janitor gcc-10-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:43:54 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9-cross-ports (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:44:22 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9-cross-ports (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:52:38 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-07 11:53:45 Launchpad Janitor gcc-9-cross (Ubuntu Focal): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:41:30 Matthias Klose gcc-10 (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:41:43 Matthias Klose gcc-10-cross (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:41:55 Matthias Klose gcc-10-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:42:05 Matthias Klose gcc-10-cross-ports (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:42:16 Matthias Klose gcc-9 (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:42:27 Matthias Klose gcc-9-cross (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:42:37 Matthias Klose gcc-9-cross-mipsen (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released
2020-10-15 20:42:48 Matthias Klose gcc-9-cross-ports (Ubuntu): status New Fix Released