| 2009-02-12 16:16:16 |
David Barth |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2009-02-21 18:45:17 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2009-02-21 18:45:17 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2009-02-22 22:04:52 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: status |
Confirmed |
Incomplete |
|
| 2009-02-22 22:04:52 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: statusexplanation |
|
I'm debating whether this should be in python-notify rather. That would get a bunch of other applications on board for free. |
|
| 2009-02-22 22:55:17 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
gajim: status |
Incomplete |
New |
|
| 2009-02-22 22:55:17 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
gajim: statusexplanation |
I'm debating whether this should be in python-notify rather. That would get a bunch of other applications on board for free. |
The reason we fall back to alert boxes at all is that there might be software we don't know about, for which the actions in notifications are vital to the use of the application, and we don't want to render those applications completely unusable in Ubuntu.
I think that argument applies exactly as much to applications using python-notify as it does to applications in general. If so, we should fix applications using python-notify individually, just as we're fixing other applications individually. |
|
| 2009-02-22 22:56:30 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
description |
Binary package hint: gajim
When a new message arrives while gajim is in the background, a notification bubble appears that, when clicked, brings the relevant window to the front. The action should be made conditional on whether the notification server supports actions. |
When a new message arrives while gajim is in the background, a notification appears that, when clicked, brings the relevant window to the front. The action should be made conditional on whether the notification server supports actions. |
|
| 2009-02-22 22:56:30 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
title |
gajim shouldn't use notifications with actions |
gajim uses notifications with actions without checking |
|
| 2009-02-22 23:22:10 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2009-02-22 23:22:10 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: importance |
Undecided |
Medium |
|
| 2009-02-22 23:22:10 |
Nafallo Bjälevik |
gajim: statusexplanation |
The reason we fall back to alert boxes at all is that there might be software we don't know about, for which the actions in notifications are vital to the use of the application, and we don't want to render those applications completely unusable in Ubuntu.
I think that argument applies exactly as much to applications using python-notify as it does to applications in general. If so, we should fix applications using python-notify individually, just as we're fixing other applications individually. |
|
|
| 2009-02-25 14:45:34 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'gajim.diff' (gajim.diff) |
| 2009-02-25 15:15:06 |
Launchpad Janitor |
gajim: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2009-07-26 11:10:21 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:ubuntu/karmic/gajim |
|
