PPD-O-MATIC'ally generated driver for Lexmark E120n not working
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
foomatic-db (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
I recently installed my Lexmark E120n (E120 with a network interface in addition to the USB) on Maverick. Unfortunately, printing didn't work, neither via USB nor via ethernet. The problem manifests itself in the printer starting to roll the drum, but never actually feeding the paper from the feed. Upgrading to Natty didn't help, neither did the driver from openprinting.org; yet I'm fairly certain it worked out-of-the-box in prior versions of Ubuntu. It really seems to be due to an incorrect PPD file, created by PPD-O-MATIC.
The problem, and a solution which worked for me as well, have been described here (props to user ChiVampir):
http://
TL;DR: replace the contents of the file /etc/cups/
Even though I already had a solution, I decided to report this bug since, firstly, it took me some time to find the correct solution & others should have it easier (and one needs to have a linuxquestions.org account to access the file), and secondly, I think that Ubuntu should be as flawless an experience as possible _especially_ in the regime of printing (for which Linux has some notoriety), and this is a showstopper. Apparently not too many people are keen on testing different printer models - well, here you go. One down, N-1 more to go.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: cups 1.4.6-5ubuntu1.2
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelMo
Architecture: amd64
CupsErrorLog: W [26/Jun/
Date: Sun Jun 26 22:53:52 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
Lpstat:
device for Lexmark-E120n: socket:
Lsusb:
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: Packard Bell DOT SE
Papersize: letter
PpdFiles:
LaserJet-CB-KTH: HP LaserJet 4350 Postscript (recommended)
/etc/cups/
Canon-C5051i: Canon iR-ADV C5045/5051 UFR II ver.2.2
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/zsh
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
SourcePackage: cups
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-20 (6 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 10/07/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Packard Bell
dmi.bios.version: V3.08(DDR3)
dmi.board.
dmi.board.name: SJE02_PT
dmi.board.vendor: Acer
dmi.board.version: V3.08(DDR3)
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Packard Bell
dmi.chassis.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPackardB
dmi.product.name: DOT SE
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: Packard Bell
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
affects: | cups (Ubuntu) → foomatic-db (Ubuntu) |
Changed in foomatic-db (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in foomatic-db (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
The PPD you provided contains some errors (as seen in your CupsErrorLog output) and the license of this file doesn't allow changing:
REF: Page 84, section 5.9
REF: Page 84, section 5.9
$ LANG=C cupstestppd lex120n.ppd
lex120n.ppd: FAIL
**FAIL** Bad Resolution choice PrinterS!
**FAIL** Bad Resolution choice 1200IQ!
Actually the driver was changed from pxlmono to Postscript starting with maverick (see bug #548747).
But fortunatelly the other drivers are still there, you can change them in System > Administration > Printing (system- config- printer) > Make and model > Change ... > Lexmark > E120n or create several new printing queues with different drivers. Can you try the pxlmono (previous recommended driver, is it very slow with graphics as mentioned in bug #548747?), hpijs-pcl5e (this is currently the recommended driver for the E120 without network) and ljet4 (recommended in bug #548747, ljet4d is for duplex) drivers? graphics) and which the best printing speed? Can you make an ordered list of the drivers starting with the driver you think works best to worst or not at all. How does it compare to the PPD file you added to this bug report?
Which driver gives the best print quality (try text/lineart/
Also does this printer support automatic double sided printing (duplex)? Optional module?