Ubuntu
flashplugin-nonfree package

package flashplugin-downloader 11.1.102.55ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Bug #917087 reported by Mapexadi on 2012-01-16

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #876298: [FFe] [MASTER] We need to better handle external payloads (Flash, msttcorefonts) not being available.. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: flashplugin-downloader 11.1.102.55ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic-pae 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Jan 16 06:54:39 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
Title: package flashplugin-downloader 11.1.102.55ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Mapexadi (mapexadi) wrote on 2012-01-16:

AptOrdering.txt Edit (215 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (2.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Df.txt Edit (364 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dmesg.txt Edit (85.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgHistoryLog.txt Edit (59.2 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgTerminalLog.txt Edit (1.5 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DuplicateSignature.txt Edit (560 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Apport retracing service (apport) on 2012-01-16

tags:

removed: need-duplicate-check

Revision history for this message

Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote on 2012-04-11:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 876298, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.