Activity log for bug #212648

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2008-04-06 03:21:45 stop bug added bug
2008-04-11 08:42:32 Timo Aaltonen xorg: importance Undecided Medium
2008-04-11 08:42:32 Timo Aaltonen xorg: status New Confirmed
2008-04-11 08:42:51 Timo Aaltonen title a visit to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in firefox hardy causes X to restart [nvidia-new] a visit to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in firefox hardy causes X to restart
2008-04-13 19:23:29 manny bug added attachment 'xorg.conf' (my xorg.conf)
2008-04-13 20:36:35 Jeremy LaCroix bug added attachment 'Xorg.0.log.txt' (Xorg.0.log.txt)
2008-04-14 05:47:03 sune bug added attachment 'xorg.conf' (xorg.conf)
2008-04-14 05:48:42 sune bug added attachment 'Xorg.0.log' (Xorg.0.log)
2008-04-14 06:21:10 Nick B. bug added attachment 'Xorg-core-dump.txt' (Xorg-core-dump.txt)
2008-04-14 06:21:58 Nick B. bug added attachment 'Xorg.0.log' (Xorg.0.log)
2008-04-14 06:22:33 Nick B. bug added attachment 'xorg.conf' (xorg.conf)
2008-04-17 21:56:25 Timo Aaltonen xorg: status New Invalid
2008-04-27 23:20:14 mbana bug added attachment 'Xorg.0.log.old' (/Xorg.0.log.old)
2008-04-27 23:20:51 mbana bug added attachment 'Xorg.0.log' (Xorg.0.log)
2008-04-27 23:21:17 mbana bug added attachment 'xorg.conf' (xorg.conf)
2008-04-28 01:48:15 Vadim Peretokin bug added attachment 'unnamed' (unnamed)
2008-05-04 11:19:22 bekirserifoglu@gmail.com bug added attachment 'xorg.conf' (xorg.conf)
2008-05-06 01:47:39 Bryce Harrington description Binary package hint: xorg If you go to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in hardy with latest updates and click the second link on the left ("Conspiracy"), X will restart. This bug seems to be 100% reproducible by some while nothing happens with others (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=746777). It might be that this only occurs on 64 bit, but this is just an assumption. Bug is confirmed by me under 64 bit. Binary package hint: xorg If you go to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in hardy with latest updates and click the second link on the left ("Conspiracy"), X will restart. This bug seems to be 100% reproducible by some while nothing happens with others (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=746777). It might be that this only occurs on 64 bit, but this is just an assumption. Bug is confirmed by me under 64 bit. [Update] Nvidia reports (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1639245&postcount=13): Re: This web page crashex 169.12 and 173.08 but not 169.04 It should be using the one from the server. That looks like a bug in the package. The .run installer will always create a symlink from libnvidia-wfb.so.1 to libnvidia-wfb.so.1.x.y.z, and then will create a symlink from libwfb.so to libnvidia-wfb.so.1 only if an existing libwfb.so doesn't already exist. The idea is that if the server installed one, it'll use that, and if someone used a distribution package and then installed the .run file over it, the distro package would have already created a libwfb.so -> libnvidia-wfb.so.1 symlink. In practice, I don't think that was communicated clearly enough to the distributions. [Testcase] To reproduce the bug, gedit killer.html and paste the following line: <div style="border: 1px solid #000; border-left: none; height: 200000px;"></div> Save, close, and open with Firefox. WARNING: This will probably crash X for users with proprietary Nvidia drivers and 8xxx series cards (at least it crashes for me). [Workaround] sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/nvidia/libwfb.so.xserver-xorg-core /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so [Thanks go to Nick B and Silviu Julean for their analysis work]
2008-05-06 01:47:39 Bryce Harrington title [nvidia-new] a visit to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in firefox hardy causes X to restart [nvidia-new, hardy] certain websites in firefox causes X restart due to lack of wfb symlink
2008-05-06 01:47:50 Bryce Harrington linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: status Confirmed Triaged
2008-05-06 01:58:35 Bryce Harrington linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: importance Medium Critical
2008-05-06 02:02:47 Bryce Harrington description Binary package hint: xorg If you go to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in hardy with latest updates and click the second link on the left ("Conspiracy"), X will restart. This bug seems to be 100% reproducible by some while nothing happens with others (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=746777). It might be that this only occurs on 64 bit, but this is just an assumption. Bug is confirmed by me under 64 bit. [Update] Nvidia reports (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1639245&postcount=13): Re: This web page crashex 169.12 and 173.08 but not 169.04 It should be using the one from the server. That looks like a bug in the package. The .run installer will always create a symlink from libnvidia-wfb.so.1 to libnvidia-wfb.so.1.x.y.z, and then will create a symlink from libwfb.so to libnvidia-wfb.so.1 only if an existing libwfb.so doesn't already exist. The idea is that if the server installed one, it'll use that, and if someone used a distribution package and then installed the .run file over it, the distro package would have already created a libwfb.so -> libnvidia-wfb.so.1 symlink. In practice, I don't think that was communicated clearly enough to the distributions. [Testcase] To reproduce the bug, gedit killer.html and paste the following line: <div style="border: 1px solid #000; border-left: none; height: 200000px;"></div> Save, close, and open with Firefox. WARNING: This will probably crash X for users with proprietary Nvidia drivers and 8xxx series cards (at least it crashes for me). [Workaround] sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/nvidia/libwfb.so.xserver-xorg-core /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so [Thanks go to Nick B and Silviu Julean for their analysis work] Binary package hint: xorg If you go to http://www.themareks.com/xf/ in hardy with latest updates and click the second link on the left ("Conspiracy"), X will restart. This bug seems to be 100% reproducible by some while nothing happens with others (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=746777). It might be that this only occurs on 64 bit, but this is just an assumption. Bug is confirmed by me under 64 bit. [Update] Nvidia reports (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1639245&postcount=13): Re: This web page crashex 169.12 and 173.08 but not 169.04 It should be using the one from the server. That looks like a bug in the package. The .run installer will always create a symlink from libnvidia-wfb.so.1 to libnvidia-wfb.so.1.x.y.z, and then will create a symlink from libwfb.so to libnvidia-wfb.so.1 only if an existing libwfb.so doesn't already exist. The idea is that if the server installed one, it'll use that, and if someone used a distribution package and then installed the .run file over it, the distro package would have already created a libwfb.so -> libnvidia-wfb.so.1 symlink. In practice, I don't think that was communicated clearly enough to the distributions. [Testcase] To reproduce the bug, gedit killer.html and paste the following line: <div style="border: 1px solid #000; border-left: none; height: 200000px;"></div> Save, close, and open with Firefox. WARNING: This will probably crash X for users with proprietary Nvidia drivers and 8xxx series cards (at least it crashes for me). [Workaround] sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/nvidia/libwfb.so.xserver-xorg-core /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so Or alternately, To temporarily fix the problem (if you're running nvidia-glx-new) download the updated libwfb and then copy it over to your /usr/lib/xorg/modules directory, and then create a new symbolic link to libwfb: $ wget http://people.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/wfb/Linux-x86_64/libnvidia-wfb.so.173.08 $ mv libnvidia-wfb.so.173.08 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/ $ sudo chown root /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libnvidia-wfb.so.173.08 $ sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libnvidia-wfb.so.173.08 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so Restart xorg and everything should function normally. Enjoy! To restore back to the original, drop back to the X terminal (ctrl+alt+f1) and then link back the original library. $ sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libnvidia-wfb.so.169.12 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so instead of libnvidia-wfb.so.173.08 And your X should function as normal without having to reinstall the nvidia drivers. [Thanks go to Nick B, tam and Silviu Julean for their investigation/analysis work]
2008-05-06 13:52:15 Timo Aaltonen linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: assignee tjaalton
2008-05-07 11:46:05 Timo Aaltonen xorg: status New Invalid
2008-05-07 11:47:08 Timo Aaltonen linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: importance Undecided Critical
2008-05-07 11:47:08 Timo Aaltonen linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: assignee tjaalton
2008-05-07 11:47:08 Timo Aaltonen linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: status New Fix Committed
2008-05-07 11:47:23 Timo Aaltonen bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2008-05-07 11:48:35 Timo Aaltonen bug added attachment 'lrm-diff' (lrm-diff)
2008-05-07 14:59:16 Alberto Milone bug assigned to linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
2008-05-07 14:59:54 Alberto Milone linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24: status New In Progress
2008-05-07 14:59:54 Alberto Milone linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24: assignee albertomilone
2008-05-07 15:08:16 Martin Pitt bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2008-05-07 15:08:59 Martin Pitt linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24: status New Fix Committed
2008-05-07 15:09:35 Martin Pitt linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24: status Fix Committed Confirmed
2008-05-16 15:08:53 Martin Pitt linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24: status In Progress Fix Released
2008-05-16 15:09:04 Martin Pitt linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24: status Confirmed Fix Released
2008-05-19 19:21:41 John Vivirito firefox: status New Invalid
2008-05-19 19:21:56 John Vivirito firefox: status New Invalid
2008-05-26 09:18:17 Martin Pitt linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: status Fix Committed Fix Released
2008-05-26 15:54:09 erat123 bug added attachment 'unnamed' (unnamed)
2008-06-16 06:06:37 Timo Aaltonen linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: status Triaged Fix Released
2008-06-16 06:06:37 Timo Aaltonen linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24: assignee tjaalton
2008-06-30 16:30:21 Vadim Peretokin bug added attachment 'unnamed' (unnamed)