| 2009-02-09 13:59:34 |
Martin |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2009-02-09 15:20:14 |
||sico|| |
None: status |
New |
Invalid |
|
| 2009-02-09 15:20:14 |
||sico|| |
None: bugtargetdisplayname |
Ubuntu |
firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2009-02-09 15:20:14 |
||sico|| |
None: bugtargetname |
ubuntu |
firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2009-02-09 15:20:14 |
||sico|| |
None: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2009-02-09 15:20:14 |
||sico|| |
None: title |
Bug #327185 in Ubuntu: "Include doi addon by default in firefox" |
Bug #327185 in firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu): "Include doi addon by default in firefox" |
|
| 2009-02-09 18:01:50 |
Alexander Sack |
bug |
|
|
assigned to firefox-extensions |
| 2009-02-09 18:02:16 |
Alexander Sack |
title |
Include doi addon by default in firefox |
[needs-packaging] doi addon for firefox |
|
| 2009-02-09 18:03:32 |
Alexander Sack |
firefox-extensions: status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2009-02-09 18:03:32 |
Alexander Sack |
firefox-extensions: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
| 2009-02-09 18:03:32 |
Alexander Sack |
firefox-extensions: statusexplanation |
|
made a needs-packaging bug out of it and filed against the firefox-extensions project which we use to track packaging requests.
what license does DOI have? do they include a license in the .xpi? are they shipping binary components (e.g. *.so files)? |
|
