package fglrx (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

Bug #1071087 reported by Robert Lee Swint Jr.
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
fglrx-installer (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

### I'm running Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 Quantal Qetzal
==== after trying to install the proprietary ATI driver & Catalyst control center from AMD's website for Linux 64 bit (x86)
==== after reboot (resolution was lower and had black area about an inch all the way around the desktop.
==== the fglrx-info didn't show the graphics card and the catalyst control center wouldn't load.
==== so i had run apt-get install fglrx and fglrx-updates and tried reinstalling the proprietary ATI driver and it still didn't work.
==== then i ran the ATI installer again but this time selected to build a .deb package for Ubuntu. It didn't work right off the bat
==== so i had to do apt-get install **** for some dependencies. Then i ran the ATI installer again and tried to build the .deb
==== packages and it worked. it made 3 .deb packages one fglrx-ubuntu, one fglrx-dev, and the .deb for the catalyst software.
==== i tried to open the fglrx_8.970-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb with Ubuntu Software Center and upon opening it started trying to
==== load it but it said some kind of thing like it didn't have the right stuff to install the package. so i closed the Software
==== Center. Now every time i try to open the software center it opens the gui and the circular loading indicator looks
==== like it's 1/4th full but it's not moving and then 1 second later it just closes.... (poof)... ps -ax shows no process for it after
==== this happens. i've looked at the work around they had to use for 12.04 where that .py file on line 176 had some command
==== that caused this same kind of thing... but they've since fixed this and my .py file didn't even have the lines at 176 that
==== those workarounds were talking about. i tried removing software-center and reinstalling several different ways.
==== each time i uninstalled / reinstalled it it still would automatically close after 1 second of the GUI popping up.
==== so i'm not sure if it's not graphics driver related because my xorg.conf is setup with an aticonfig --initial setting but as
==== i said earlier fglrx-info says no card is detected. now i'm trying to continue to install that
==== fglrx_8.970-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb but it's having dependency issues saying that it does need fglrx-updates, but then
==== when i install them it says that they are conflicting and cannot be removed and the .deb install process exits.
==== so i was searching google for solutions and someone posted this command to clean out everything fglrx related.
==== sudo apt-get autoremove --purge fglrx fglrx-updates
==== now here's the bug... i've included the terminal window output. ubuntu studio caught this as a bug and prompted me
==== to submit it and go to this website (i just created an account). i'm going to keep trying to install the
==== fglrx_8.970-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb by running this command line:

extalin@xtal-workstation:~$ sudo apt-get autoremove --purge fglrx fglrx-updates
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  fglrx* fglrx-amdcccle-updates* fglrx-updates*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 254 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
(Reading database ... 237212 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fglrx ...
Purging configuration files for fglrx ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/atieventsd exists during rc.d purge (use -f to force)
dpkg: error processing fglrx (--purge):
 subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Removing fglrx-amdcccle-updates ...
Removing fglrx-updates ...
Removing all DKMS Modules
Done.
update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib/fglrx/ld.so.conf (part of link group x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives
update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib/pxpress/ld.so.conf (part of link group x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives
update-alternatives: warning: /etc/alternatives/x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf is dangling; it will be updated with best choice
update-alternatives: using /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mesa/ld.so.conf to provide /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu_GL.conf (x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf) in auto mode
update-alternatives: warning: not replacing /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules with a link
update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib/fglrx/alt_ld.so.conf (part of link group i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives
update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib/pxpress/alt_ld.so.conf (part of link group i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives
update-alternatives: warning: /etc/alternatives/i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf is dangling; it will be updated with best choice
update-alternatives: warning: forcing reinstallation of alternative /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mesa/ld.so.conf because link group x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf is broken
update-alternatives: warning: not replacing /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules with a link
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Purging configuration files for fglrx-updates ...
dpkg: warning: while removing fglrx-updates, directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules' not empty so not removed
dpkg: warning: while removing fglrx-updates, directory '/usr/share/ati' not empty so not removed
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-17-lowlatency
W: mdadm: /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf defines no arrays.
Processing triggers for ureadahead ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fglrx
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

=========================================

here's what happens when i try to install the ATI proprietary driver manually (because i'm having the ubuntu software center
crash after 1 second of GUI loading.

extalin@xtal-workstation:~/Downloads$ sudo dpkg -i fglrx_8.970-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
[sudo] password for extalin:
Selecting previously unselected package fglrx.
(Reading database ... 236922 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking fglrx (from fglrx_8.970-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of fglrx:
 fglrx depends on fglrx-updates; however:
  Package fglrx-updates is not installed.

dpkg: error processing fglrx (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Processing triggers for ureadahead ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fglrx
extalin@xtal-workstation:~/Downloads$

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: fglrx (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.18-lowlatency 3.5.5
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6
AptOrdering:
 fglrx: Purge
 fglrx-amdcccle-updates: Purge
 fglrx-updates: Purge
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Oct 24 20:25:56 2012
DuplicateSignature:
 Purging configuration files for fglrx ...
 update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
 update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/atieventsd exists during rc.d purge (use -f to force)
 dpkg: error processing fglrx (--purge):
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-19 (5 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.1)
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: fglrx-installer
Title: package fglrx (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Robert Lee Swint Jr. (extalin) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1071036, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.