libffcall should now be based on the cvs head, not 1.10 tar ball

Bug #274951 reported by sds on 2008-09-26
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ffcall (Ubuntu)

Bug Description

Binary package hint: libffcall1

package libffcall is based on the 1.10 tar ball from santafe.
this is obsolete as per
you should get the sources from the cvs as described in
many patches, including the debian/ubuntu ones,
have been incorporated into the cvs,
and no risky new features are being introduced,
so it is safe to rely on the cvs.

sds (sds-gnu) wrote :

when clisp is linked against the ubuntu-supplied libffcall
(libffcall1-dev 1.10+2.41-3)
clisp crashes on self-test.
when clisp is linked against the subversion cvs head libffcall,
all tests are passed.

This problem is still there in exactly the same way in Karmic. The libffcall package version used in Karmic is the same. It still causes a segfault during self-tests for CLISP 2.48 (and CVS), and updating libffcall to CVS HEAD fixes it. It'd be extra cool if this package could be updated so I can build CLISP without having to pull down and update the supporting libraries as well.

libffcall CVS head failed in selftest for me because it misses some symbols -- seems there are in fact some risky changes happening.

I'm about to take over maintenance of the ffcall package in Debian and have already a CVS checkout, however I'm not sure I want to push anything into unstsable before squeeze yet. just in case someone is interested

sds (sds-gnu) wrote :

it fails because you are trying to build it with shared libraries.
this is wrong.
most of the libffcall code is in the headers, the libraries are very small and they should be static.
it works for me just fine on both amd64 and i386 with the default configure options.

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ffcall - 1.10+cvs20100619-2

ffcall (1.10+cvs20100619-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Ship to unstable

ffcall (1.10+cvs20100619-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New Upstream CVS snapshot (LP: #274951) (Closes: #504515)
    * Adding support for armel
  * Upload to experimental for now
 -- Christoph Egger <email address hidden> Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:29:30 +0200

Changed in ffcall (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
sds (sds-gnu) wrote :

clisp users report that the fix does NOT work while using the libffcall cvs does.
I strongly suspect that you are building libffcall with shared libraries.

Changed in ffcall (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → Confirmed
Faré (fahree) wrote :

I see that the libffcall deb contains static libraries as well as dynamic ones. Is there a way to tell clisp to detect the latter and avoid the former?

2011/6/5 Faré <email address hidden>:
> I see that the libffcall deb contains static libraries as well as
> dynamic ones. Is there a way to tell clisp to detect the latter and
> avoid the former?

in the clisp build directory:

perl -p -i -e "s,-lavcall,/usr/lib/libavcall.a,g" `grep -I -r -l -- -lavcall .`
perl -p -i -e "s,-lcallback,/usr/lib/libcallback.a,g" `grep -I -r -l
-- -lcallback .`
make clean full check

Sam Steingold <> <>

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.