Comment 13 for bug 342362

> I did not intentionally change those elements, but I am noticing that the fonts come up sharper in the 'fixed' version.

Well, the font is changed completely. The original looks more like an "Ubuntu font"? I don't think that should be changed.

> From your example, the color range appears improved and the fonts appear sharper. I had not intended on that change, but I hope it is an improvement, albeit an unintentional one on my part.

I agree that the colors on the fixed version look better, but I wonder what caused that change. Maybe the gamma information was lost?

> One issue as mentioned in some of the other bug reports, it is obvious that these files were created with the proprietary Adobe Acrobat.

They were created with "Adobe InDesign CS3 (5.0)", according to the metadata in the files. It would be nice (and probably necessary for legal reasons) if copyright information were included with the files, so we could contact the original author. It would be even nicer if the files were created in an open source program so that we could edit them to fix errors like this.

> I think keeping it consistent among the documents is preferable, not to mention more balanced ("Ubuntu" with "Linux for Human Beings" is perfectly centred).

Yeah, I don't see any problem with making them consistent. I don't know who makes the final decision on these things, though.