Activity log for bug #635937

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2010-09-11 18:27:15 Nathaniel Homier bug added bug
2010-09-11 18:27:15 Nathaniel Homier attachment added Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635937/+attachment/1571589/+files/Dependencies.txt
2010-09-11 18:27:15 Nathaniel Homier attachment added ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635937/+attachment/1571590/+files/ProcMaps.txt
2010-09-11 18:27:15 Nathaniel Homier attachment added ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635937/+attachment/1571591/+files/ProcStatus.txt
2010-09-11 18:27:15 Nathaniel Homier attachment added XsessionErrors.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635937/+attachment/1571592/+files/XsessionErrors.txt
2010-09-11 18:30:49 Nathaniel Homier description Binary package hint: evolution For the next 3 years Ubuntu 10.04 LTS will only be able to support the SHA1 cipher. Thats 3 long years of using a broken and useless cipher. What are the options for those who require an LTS, there are no options. Upgrading to a non-LTS release defeats the purpose of using an LTS. I am very aware that hell would freeze over before this SRA request would be accepted. It's too bad that the SHA1 patch came too late for 10.04. I don't how easy an attack against SHA1 would be, would it be acceptable to wait 3 years if attacks against SHA1 are still hard enough as to not worry about it? If SHA1 attacks are trivial, then would Ubuntu please consider an SRU. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.41-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: f28209556208badd1b7f1481d04b096c CheckboxSystem: 6ce041aeed0a2c17b3343b66d157175d Date: Sat Sep 11 12:12:56 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.utf8 SourcePackage: evolution Binary package hint: evolution In the title I mean SRU not SRA. For the next 3 years Ubuntu 10.04 LTS will only be able to support the SHA1 cipher. Thats 3 long years of using a broken and useless cipher. What are the options for those who require an LTS, there are no options. Upgrading to a non-LTS release defeats the purpose of using an LTS. I am very aware that hell would freeze over before this SRU request would be accepted. It's too bad that the SHA1 patch came too late for 10.04. I don't how easy an attack against SHA1 would be, would it be acceptable to wait 3 years if attacks against SHA1 are still hard enough as to not worry about it? If SHA1 attacks are trivial, then would Ubuntu please consider an SRU. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.41-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: f28209556208badd1b7f1481d04b096c CheckboxSystem: 6ce041aeed0a2c17b3343b66d157175d Date: Sat Sep 11 12:12:56 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron:  SHELL=/bin/bash  LANG=en_US.utf8 SourcePackage: evolution
2010-09-11 18:31:09 Nathaniel Homier summary SRA request. Evolution on 10.04 LTS only supports SHA1 for the next 3 years. SHA2 would be nice. SRU request. Evolution on 10.04 LTS only supports SHA1 for the next 3 years. SHA2 would be nice.
2010-09-13 14:38:34 Pedro Villavicencio evolution (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Low
2010-09-13 14:38:34 Pedro Villavicencio evolution (Ubuntu): status New Incomplete
2010-09-13 15:30:43 Nathaniel Homier bug watch added https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304415
2010-09-13 16:56:57 Pedro Villavicencio marked as duplicate 381290
2010-11-23 13:40:38 Launchpad Janitor evolution (Ubuntu): status Incomplete Fix Released
2010-11-23 14:20:45 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/evolution-data-server
2010-11-23 14:21:36 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/evolution