apparmor denies evince creating links in .local/share/gvfs-metadata
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| evince (Ubuntu) |
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
I'm not sure exactly why evince is doing this, but when I open the attached PDF, I get these messages in my syslog:
[517153.642954] type=1400 audit(131012627
[517153.642147] type=1400 audit(131012627
I have a fix (might be a workaround) here:
--- usr.bin.evince.log 2011-07-08 09:44:30.170324154 -0300
+++ usr.bin.evince 2011-07-08 09:41:09.807227272 -0300
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
@{HOME}
@{HOME}
@{HOME}
+ @{HOME}
+ @{HOME}
# from http://
# read and write for all supported file formats
Related branches
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote : | #1 |
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote : | #2 |
Changed in evince (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
tags: | added: apparmor |
Changed in evince (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) |
milestone: | none → oneiric-alpha-3 |
Changed in evince (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) → nobody |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #3 |
This bug was fixed in the package evince - 3.1.2-0ubuntu2
---------------
evince (3.1.2-0ubuntu2) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/
@{HOME}
-- Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:29:21 -0500
Changed in evince (Ubuntu): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Released |
Sergio Gelato (sergio-gelato) wrote : | #4 |
Also seen on lucid, at least when booted into a 2.6.38 kernel (from linux-image-
Peter Schwenk (schwenk) wrote : | #5 |
This bug exists in 10.04 LTS (evince 2.30.3-0ubuntu1.2)
Fujisan (富士山) (fujisan) wrote : | #6 |
Hello,
I see the same kind of message in my /var/log/syslog file after an upgrade from 12.04 to 12.10.
[ 1111.398958] type=1400 audit(135230263
[ 1111.402288] type=1400 audit(135230263
I do not see these messages on another machine I upgraded the same way.
Also, I am unable to print 2 pages / sheet, but I do not have this problem for the 2nd machine.
Is this problem related to the two-sided printing?
Thanks for the report, Jamie may you have a look to it? Thanks.