erlang-luerl 1:1.2.3-1 source package in Ubuntu

Changelog

erlang-luerl (1:1.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version 1.2.3

 -- Philipp Huebner <email address hidden>  Thu, 03 Oct 2024 17:10:27 +0200

Upload details

Uploaded by:
Ejabberd Packaging Team
Uploaded to:
Sid
Original maintainer:
Ejabberd Packaging Team
Architectures:
any
Section:
misc
Urgency:
Medium Urgency

See full publishing history Publishing

Series Pocket Published Component Section
Plucky release universe misc

Downloads

File Size SHA-256 Checksum
erlang-luerl_1.2.3-1.dsc 2.1 KiB 01d7c0fb3a2259911298c9abb2bef43415c9c25b2d67b0823f3f953fa4092c2d
erlang-luerl_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz 536.1 KiB 5a36b4562b5151d985e03415784fde2bb5577118ffaa496516b798322e58c80a
erlang-luerl_1.2.3-1.debian.tar.xz 4.3 KiB b6a15c5dc9585824b71cfc1286e4010171813a03cb40497f8be92e51977c30e0

Available diffs

No changes file available.

Binary packages built by this source

erlang-luerl: implementation of Lua in Erlang

 An experimental implementation of Lua 5.2 written solely in pure Erlang
 .
 When to use Luerl:
 .
 Fast Language Switch: Luerl should allow you to switch between Erlang and Lua
 incredibly fast, introducing a way to use very small bits of logic programmed
 in Lua, inside an Erlang application, with good performance.
 .
 Multicore: Luerl provides a way to transparently utilize multicores. The
 underlying Erlang VM takes care of the distribution.
 .
 Microprocesses: It should give you a Lua environment that allows you to
 effortlessly run tens of thousands of Lua processes in parallel, leveraging
 the famed microprocesses implementation of the Erlang VM. The empty Luerl
 State footprint will be yet smaller than the C Lua State footprint.
 .
 Forking Up: Because of the immutable nature of the Luerl VM, it becomes a
 natural operation to use the same Lua State as a starting point for multiple
 parallel calculations.
 .
 However, Luerl will generally run slower than a reasonable native Lua
 implementation. This is mainly due the emulation of mutable data on top of an
 immutable world. There is really no way around this. An alternative would be
 to implement a special Lua memory outside of the normal Erlang, but this would
 defeat the purpose of Luerl. It would instead be then more logical to connect
 to a native Lua.
 .
 Some valid use cases for Luerl are:
  * Lua code will be run only occasionally and it wouldn't be worth managing
    an extra language implementation in the application;
  * the Lua code chunks are small so the slower speed is weighed up by Luerl's
    faster interface;
  * the Lua code calculates and reads variables more than changing them;
  * the same Lua State is repeatedly used to 'fork up' as a basis for
    massively many parallel calculations, based on the same state;
  * it is easy to run multiple instances of Luerl which could better utilise
    multicores.