/usr/local/lib64 not in ld.so.conf

[David Henningsson]

I'm not sure of the right package - it might also depend on the solution.

Anyway, we have a symlink from /usr/lib64 -> /usr/lib, but there is no corresponding /usr/local/lib64 -> /usr/local/lib symlink.

This can be a problem when you install libraries outside the package management system.

We could either add such a symlink, or fix ld.so.conf to have /usr/local/lib64 in chain of directories it looks at.

Testcase is to install fluidsynth from trunk, which then happily calls the right binary, which in turn calls the wrong library to do all the work.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: libc-bin 2.12.1-0ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.34-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Oct 17 15:19:25 2010
Dependencies:

EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha amd64 (20100826)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=sv_SE.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: eglibc

[dino99 (9d9)]

This is no more a supported version now