rebuild against xulrunner-1.9.2

Bug #537187 reported by Rolf Leggewie on 2010-03-11
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
chmsee (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
conkeror (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
eclipse (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
fennec (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
galeon (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
gjs (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
gnome-web-photo (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
kazehakase (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned
miro (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: eclipse

please rebuild eclipse (and a number of other packages currently using xulrunner-1.9.1) against the newer xulrunner-1.9.2.

Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) on 2010-03-11
description: updated
Axel Beckert (xtaran) on 2010-03-11
Changed in conkeror (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Axel Beckert (xtaran)
status: New → In Progress
status: In Progress → Fix Committed

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:51:03AM -0000, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> ** Affects: conkeror (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New

This is already fixed in the repo[1] and will be uploaded to Debian
unstable soon, i.e. with the next upload. I run Conkeror snapshots
with the preview release of Debian's xulrunner-1.9.2 since its release
without problems.

  [1] http://repo.or.cz/w/conkeror.git/commitdiff/cbc2e88fe750160adad66d8f8648493856e78c88

And since the conkeror wrapper in /usr/bin/conkeror works fine again
with Ubuntu's xulrunner[2], too, since January, you should be able to
use the unmodified Debian package.

  [2] http://repo.or.cz/w/conkeror.git/commitdiff/cbc2e88fe750160adad66d8f8648493856e78c88

I would really appreciate it, if a version including those two commits
would be included in Lucid.

  Regards, Axel (Debian maintainer of conkeror)
--
 ,''`. | Axel Beckert <email address hidden>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5

Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

 affects ubuntu/gjs
 assign raof
 status inprogress

This is blocked on an i386 & armel FTBFS; I'm investigating.

Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote :

There wasn't really any need to open a bug report like that with all those tasks - we're already well aware of the packages which need rebuilding and already working through them

Changed in gjs (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in eclipse (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Benjamin Drung (bdrung)
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

I'm closing all the bug tasks in this bug as this just creates a lot of bug noise for everyone. We're opening individual bugs against each package as we port them.

You can follow this wiki page for overall progress:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/xulrunner-list

Changed in miro (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in gnome-web-photo (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in gjs (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Invalid
Changed in galeon (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in fennec (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in eclipse (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in conkeror (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → In Progress
Changed in eclipse (Ubuntu):
assignee: Benjamin Drung (bdrung) → nobody
Changed in chmsee (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in kazehakase (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in conkeror (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Invalid
assignee: Axel Beckert (xtaran) → nobody
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers