Activity log for bug #114130
| Date | Who | What changed | Old value | New value | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-05-11 23:08:09 | Josh Scholar | bug | added bug | ||
| 2007-05-12 13:55:22 | Markus Thielmann | None: statusexplanation | Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in "eclipse-cdt". | ||
| 2008-10-09 20:04:39 | Daniel T Chen | eclipse-cdt: status | New | Incomplete | |
| 2008-10-09 20:04:39 | Daniel T Chen | eclipse-cdt: importance | Undecided | Wishlist | |
| 2008-10-09 20:04:39 | Daniel T Chen | eclipse-cdt: statusexplanation | Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in "eclipse-cdt". | I'm not sure if you really want eclipse-cdt to depend on the /entire/ set of eclipse* packages, because that would negate having split them into separate ones. Please see the long description for the eclipse metapackage. | |
| 2008-12-18 19:18:28 | Pedro Villavicencio | eclipse-cdt: status | Incomplete | Invalid | |
| 2008-12-18 19:18:28 | Pedro Villavicencio | eclipse-cdt: statusexplanation | I'm not sure if you really want eclipse-cdt to depend on the /entire/ set of eclipse* packages, because that would negate having split them into separate ones. Please see the long description for the eclipse metapackage. |
