Please sync e2fsprogs e2fsprogs 1.40.7-1 with Debian
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
e2fsprogs |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Martin Pitt | ||
Hardy |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Martin Pitt |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: e2fsprogs
Hardy currently has 1.40.3-1; the latest release on e2fsprogs's current maintenance branch is 1.40.7. There are a number of pretty serious bugs that have been fixed since 1.40.3-1, especially:
Launchpad bug #187265, fsck: root primary superblock differs from backup immediately after install
(which if past experience is any guide, will result in *many* launchpad bugs being filed as people complain about needless fsck's; the past set of complaints for people east of GMT time zone will be as nothing in comparison!)
Other important ones (the numbers below are debian bugs) include:
* Fix blkid code to avoid segfaulting when a device mapper volume
disappears out from under it.
* Fix bug in the blkid library where cached filesystems was not being
flushed when opening USB devices returned the error ENOMEDIUM.
(Closes: #463787)
* Avoid a floating point exception when blkid tries to probe a corrpt
reiserfs filesystem.
* Fix fsck to only treat '#' characters at the beginning of /etc/fstab
lines as starting a comment. This avoids spurious warnings printed
for filesystems such as fuse that often use '#' as part of the
filesystem specifier (i.e., wdfs#https:/
* Fix potential integer overflows passed to malloc() in resize2fs
* Fix potential divide by zero error when libblkid tried probing an
invalid FAT filesystem.
The latest blkid changes are also going to be needed to allow a mount program to correctly support ext4. (Of course util-linux under Ubuntu is currently different from Debian in that it uses volid instead of blkid, but I'm not expecting Ubuntu to change that at this late date; I'll probably just post replacement packages for people who want to use the ext4 filesystem.)
Changed in e2fsprogs: | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
Hi,
I subscribed ubuntu- main-sponsors, however maybe that wasn't
the right thing to do.
It seems as though this isn't a formal sync request, more of
a recommendation that we do the sync.
Theodore, is that correct? Has this version been tested on
Ubuntu?
Apologies if I created more work for someone.
Thanks,
James