1. I was asked by persia to help with migration. I believe that GTK1.2 support is to be dropped soon (it will still be in hardy but not in intrepid)
2. I am not so sure about that one but I removed the build dependency because it's either GTK2 including it differently now or it's e16menuedit not even needing it as you can see I removed the linking against that lib and the build still worked. It seemed sane to me but to be honest I am not that much into GTK1.2/2 issues.
3. the patch was created with cdbs-edit-patch and I believe it was named .dpatch by it. It could also be that I renamed it (I am not quite used to proper packaging, so that could have been my fault)
I did not check whether the patches actually get used. But I wonder how my debuild worked if it would not patch... Strange...
Hi,
1. I was asked by persia to help with migration. I believe that GTK1.2 support is to be dropped soon (it will still be in hardy but not in intrepid)
2. I am not so sure about that one but I removed the build dependency because it's either GTK2 including it differently now or it's e16menuedit not even needing it as you can see I removed the linking against that lib and the build still worked. It seemed sane to me but to be honest I am not that much into GTK1.2/2 issues.
3. the patch was created with cdbs-edit-patch and I believe it was named .dpatch by it. It could also be that I renamed it (I am not quite used to proper packaging, so that could have been my fault)
I did not check whether the patches actually get used. But I wonder how my debuild worked if it would not patch... Strange...
Bye
Lars
debian bug is http:// bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 468866