package grub-efi-amd64 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.11 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Bug #1701937 reported by Madhurima Reddy
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
dpkg (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
grub2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Update and upgradation of the software is not possible.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: grub-efi-amd64 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.11
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-81.104-generic 4.4.67
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-81-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jul 1 16:09:41 2017
DuplicateSignature:
 package:grub-efi-amd64:2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.11
 Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
 dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64 (--configure):
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-11-09 (235 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-81-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=5bd8e3b1-710e-4a02-be4e-74825d867018 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2
 apt 1.2.20
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package grub-efi-amd64 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.11 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Madhurima Reddy (madhurima1006) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote : Bug is not a security issue

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private Security → Public
tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.