dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dosfstools (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
dosfstools (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
High
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #301254 http://
In Debian Bug tracker #301254, Justin Pryzby (justinpryzby-users) wrote : tagging 301254 | #1 |
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #2 |
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #301254 http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #3 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100
From: Mario Holbe <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors
Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
the new 2.11-1 dosfsck shows lots of errors on my filesystems (FAT32,
LFN / VFAT), while the filesystem looks quite okay and neither Windows
scandisk nor 2.10-1 dosfsck show any errors.
The errors reported are (perhaps among others):
* Start cluster beyond limit (...). Truncating file.
* File size is ... bytes, cluster chain length is 0 bytes.
Truncating file to 0 bytes.
* Free cluster summary wrong (... vs. really ...)
* Start does point to root directory. Deleting dir.
As you can see in other bug reports, users seem to stumble over it
already. Therefore, I consider this bug grave enough to prevent
2.11-1 from migration into testing, thus I raised the serverity
appropriately.
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who
understand binary, and those who don't...
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #4 |
Message-Id: <E1DEXL4-
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:45:48 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: tagging 301254
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #5 |
dosfstools | 2.10-1 | http://
In Debian Bug tracker #301254, Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : | #6 |
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:36:49 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: tagging 301254
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid
In Debian Bug tracker #301254, Aigars Mahinovs (aigarius) wrote : A transcript of a fake VFAT error | #8 |
This filesystem is absolutely correct, yet the fsck.vfat tries to fix
it. If I let fsck.vfat fix the filesystem, all files residing after
certain treshold in the file system are truncated and shown as lost
chunks. It seams that something is wrong with maximum sector
calculation.
This is with dosfstools of version 2.11-1. This really is a grave bug
- it destroyed my Windows filesystem *twice* before I understud what
was going on. :P
-------
aigarius@
dosfsck 2.11 (12 Mar 2005)
dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem
There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
Differences: (offset:
90:33/0e, 91:c9/1f, 92:8e/be, 93:d1/74, 94:bc/7e, 95:f4/ac, 96:7b/22
, 97:8e/c0, 98:c1/74, 99:8e/06, 100:d9/b4, 101:bd/0e, 102:00/cd, 103:7c/10
, 104:88/eb, 105:4e/f5, 106:02/b4, 107:8a/00, 108:56/cd, 109:40/16
, 111:08/00, 113:13/19, 114:73/eb, 115:05/fe, 116:b9/54, 117:ff/68
, 118:ff/69, 119:8a/73, 120:f1/20, 121:66/70, 122:0f/61, 123:b6/72
, 124:c6/74, 125:40/69, 126:66/74, 127:0f/69, 128:b6/6f, 129:d1/6e
, 130:80/20, 131:e2/64, 132:3f/6f, 133:f7/65, 134:e2/73, 135:86/20
, 136:cd/6e, 137:c0/6f, 138:ed/74, 139:06/20, 140:41/68, 141:66/61
, 142:0f/76, 143:b7/65, 144:c9/20, 145:66/61, 146:f7/6e, 147:e1/20
, 148:66/6f, 149:89/70, 150:46/65, 151:f8/72, 152:83/61, 153:7e/74
, 154:16/69, 155:00/6e, 156:75/67, 157:38/20, 158:83/73, 159:7e/79
, 160:2a/73, 161:00/74, 162:77/65, 163:32/6d, 164:66/20, 165:8b/6c
, 166:46/6f, 167:1c/61, 168:66/64, 169:83/65, 170:c0/72, 171:0c/20
, 172:bb/69, 173:00/6e, 174:80/73, 175:b9/74, 176:01/61, 177:00/6c
, 178:e8/6c, 179:2b/65, 180:00/64, 181:e9/20, 182:48/6f, 183:03/6e
, 184:a0/20, 185:fa/69, 186:7d/74, 187:b4/2e, 188:7d/0a, 189:8b/0d
, 190:f0/50, 191:ac/72, 192:84/65, 193:c0/73, 194:74/73, 195:17/20
, 196:3c/61, 197:ff/20, 198:74/6b, 199:09/65, 200:b4/79, 201:0e/20
, 202:bb/74, 203:07/6f, 204:00/20, 205:cd/72, 206:10/65, 207:eb/62
, 208:ee/6f, 209:a0/6f, 210:fb/74, 211:7d/2e, 212:eb/2e, 213:e5/2e
, 214:a0/00, 215:f9/00, 216:7d/00, 217:eb/00, 218:e0/00, 219:98/00
, 220:cd/00, 221:16/00, 222:cd/00, 223:19/00, 224:66/00, 225:60/00
, 226:66/00, 227:3b/00, 228:46/00, 229:f8/00, 230:0f/00, 231:82/00
, 232:4a/00, 234:66/00, 235:6a/00, 237:66/00, 238:50/00, 239:06/00
, 240:53/00, 241:66/00, 242:68/00, 243:10/00, 245:01/00, 247:80/00
, 248:7e/00, 249:02/00, 251:0f/00, 252:85/00, 253:20/00, 255:b4/00
, 256:41/00, 257:bb/00, 258:aa/00, 259:55/00, 260:8a/00, 261:56/00
, 262:40/00, 263:cd/00, 264:13/00, 265:0f/00, 266:82/00, 267:1c/00
, 269:81/00, 270:fb/00, 271:55/00, 272:aa/00, 273:0f/00, 274:85/00
, 275:14/00, 277:f6/00, 278:c1/00, 279:01/00, 280:0f/00, 281:84/00
, 282:0d/00, 284:fe/00, 285:46/00, 286:02/00, 287:b4/00, 288:42/00
, 289:8a/00, 290:56/00, 291:40/00, 292:8b/00, 293:f4/00, 294:cd/00
, 295:13/00, 296:b0/00, 297:f9/00, 298:66/00, 299:58/00, 300:66/00
, 301:58/00, 302:66/00, 303:58/00, 304:66/00, 305:58/00, 306:eb/00
, 307:2a/00, 308:66/00, 309:33/00, 310:d2/00, 311:66/00, 312:0f/00
, 313:b7/...
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #9 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:54:23 +0300
From: Aigars Mahinovs <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: A transcript of a fake VFAT error
This filesystem is absolutely correct, yet the fsck.vfat tries to fix
it. If I let fsck.vfat fix the filesystem, all files residing after
certain treshold in the file system are truncated and shown as lost
chunks. It seams that something is wrong with maximum sector
calculation.
This is with dosfstools of version 2.11-1. This really is a grave bug
- it destroyed my Windows filesystem *twice* before I understud what
was going on. :P
-------
aigarius@
dosfsck 2.11 (12 Mar 2005)
dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem
There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
Differences: (offset:
90:33/0e, 91:c9/1f, 92:8e/be, 93:d1/74, 94:bc/7e, 95:f4/ac, 96:7b/22
, 97:8e/c0, 98:c1/74, 99:8e/06, 100:d9/b4, 101:bd/0e, 102:00/cd, 103:7c/10
, 104:88/eb, 105:4e/f5, 106:02/b4, 107:8a/00, 108:56/cd, 109:40/16
, 111:08/00, 113:13/19, 114:73/eb, 115:05/fe, 116:b9/54, 117:ff/68
, 118:ff/69, 119:8a/73, 120:f1/20, 121:66/70, 122:0f/61, 123:b6/72
, 124:c6/74, 125:40/69, 126:66/74, 127:0f/69, 128:b6/6f, 129:d1/6e
, 130:80/20, 131:e2/64, 132:3f/6f, 133:f7/65, 134:e2/73, 135:86/20
, 136:cd/6e, 137:c0/6f, 138:ed/74, 139:06/20, 140:41/68, 141:66/61
, 142:0f/76, 143:b7/65, 144:c9/20, 145:66/61, 146:f7/6e, 147:e1/20
, 148:66/6f, 149:89/70, 150:46/65, 151:f8/72, 152:83/61, 153:7e/74
, 154:16/69, 155:00/6e, 156:75/67, 157:38/20, 158:83/73, 159:7e/79
, 160:2a/73, 161:00/74, 162:77/65, 163:32/6d, 164:66/20, 165:8b/6c
, 166:46/6f, 167:1c/61, 168:66/64, 169:83/65, 170:c0/72, 171:0c/20
, 172:bb/69, 173:00/6e, 174:80/73, 175:b9/74, 176:01/61, 177:00/6c
, 178:e8/6c, 179:2b/65, 180:00/64, 181:e9/20, 182:48/6f, 183:03/6e
, 184:a0/20, 185:fa/69, 186:7d/74, 187:b4/2e, 188:7d/0a, 189:8b/0d
, 190:f0/50, 191:ac/72, 192:84/65, 193:c0/73, 194:74/73, 195:17/20
, 196:3c/61, 197:ff/20, 198:74/6b, 199:09/65, 200:b4/79, 201:0e/20
, 202:bb/74, 203:07/6f, 204:00/20, 205:cd/72, 206:10/65, 207:eb/62
, 208:ee/6f, 209:a0/6f, 210:fb/74, 211:7d/2e, 212:eb/2e, 213:e5/2e
, 214:a0/00, 215:f9/00, 216:7d/00, 217:eb/00, 218:e0/00, 219:98/00
, 220:cd/00, 221:16/00, 222:cd/00, 223:19/00, 224:66/00, 225:60/00
, 226:66/00, 227:3b/00, 228:46/00, 229:f8/00, 230:0f/00, 231:82/00
, 232:4a/00, 234:66/00, 235:6a/00, 237:66/00, 238:50/00, 239:06/00
, 240:53/00, 241:66/00, 242:68/00, 243:10/00, 245:01/00, 247:80/00
, 248:7e/00, 249:02/00, 251:0f/00, 252:85/00, 253:20/00, 255:b4/00
, 256:41/00, 257:bb/00, 258:aa/00, 259:55/00, 260:8a/00, 261:56/00
, 262:40/00, 263:cd/00, 264:13/00, 265:0f/00, 266:82/00, 267:1c/00
, 269:81/00, 270:fb/00, 271:55/00, 272:aa/00, 273:0f/00, 274:85/00
, 275:14/00, 277:f6/00, 278:c1/00, 279:01/00, 280:0f/00, 281:84/00
, 282:0d/00, 284:fe/00, 285:46/00, 286:02/00, 287:b4/00, 288:42/00
, 289:8a/00, 290:56/00, 291:40/00, 292:8b/00, 293:f4/00, 294:cd/00
, 295:13...
In Debian Bug tracker #301254, Petr Salinger (petr-salinger) wrote : missing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in debian/rules | #10 |
severity 300126 grave
tag 300126 patch
merge 300126 301254
quit
The patch should fix the problem,
which is that mkdosfs needs
to be compiled with large file support.
In Debian Bug tracker #301254, Roman Hodek (roman-hodek) wrote : Bug#301254: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2 | #11 |
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
-D_
$(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
#300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
Closes: #300126, #301254.
* #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
995f3cc08408db
5b807e616f4191
5add46c0f2b78d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #301254, Roman Hodek (roman-hodek) wrote : Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2 | #12 |
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
-D_
$(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
#300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
Closes: #300126, #301254.
* #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
995f3cc08408db
5b807e616f4191
5add46c0f2b78d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #13 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:15:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Petr Salinger <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: missing -D_FILE_
severity 300126 grave
tag 300126 patch
merge 300126 301254
quit
The patch should fix the problem,
which is that mkdosfs needs
to be compiled with large file support.
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #14 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
-D_
$(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
#300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
Closes: #300126, #301254.
* #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
995f3cc08408db
5b807e616f4191
5add46c0f2b78d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #15 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#301254: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
dosfstools_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
-D_
$(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
#300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
Closes: #300126, #301254.
* #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
995f3cc08408db
5b807e616f4191
5add46c0f2b78d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Changed in dosfstools: | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid