dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors

Bug #14502 reported by Debian Bug Importer
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
dosfstools (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
dosfstools (Ubuntu)
Invalid
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #301254 http://bugs.debian.org/301254

Revision history for this message
In , Justin Pryzby (justinpryzby-users) wrote : tagging 301254

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #301254 http://bugs.debian.org/301254

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100
From: Mario Holbe <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors

Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: grave

Hello,

the new 2.11-1 dosfsck shows lots of errors on my filesystems (FAT32,
LFN / VFAT), while the filesystem looks quite okay and neither Windows
scandisk nor 2.10-1 dosfsck show any errors.

The errors reported are (perhaps among others):
* Start cluster beyond limit (...). Truncating file.
* File size is ... bytes, cluster chain length is 0 bytes.
  Truncating file to 0 bytes.
* Free cluster summary wrong (... vs. really ...)
* Start does point to root directory. Deleting dir.

As you can see in other bug reports, users seem to stumble over it
already. Therefore, I consider this bug grave enough to prevent
2.11-1 from migration into testing, thus I raised the serverity
appropriately.

Thanks for your work & regards
   Mario
--
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who
understand binary, and those who don't...

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <E1DEXL4-0007Xo-00@localhost>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:45:48 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: tagging 301254

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

dosfstools | 2.10-1 | http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hoary/main Packages

Revision history for this message
In , Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:36:49 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: tagging 301254

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 301254 sid

Revision history for this message
In , Aigars Mahinovs (aigarius) wrote : A transcript of a fake VFAT error
Download full text (7.4 KiB)

This filesystem is absolutely correct, yet the fsck.vfat tries to fix
it. If I let fsck.vfat fix the filesystem, all files residing after
certain treshold in the file system are truncated and shown as lost
chunks. It seams that something is wrong with maximum sector
calculation.

This is with dosfstools of version 2.11-1. This really is a grave bug
- it destroyed my Windows filesystem *twice* before I understud what
was going on. :P

------------------LOG-BEGIN----------------------------
aigarius@aigarhome:~$ sudo fsck.msdos -vn /dev/hda1
dosfsck 2.11 (12 Mar 2005)
dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem
There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
Differences: (offset:original/backup)
  90:33/0e, 91:c9/1f, 92:8e/be, 93:d1/74, 94:bc/7e, 95:f4/ac, 96:7b/22
  , 97:8e/c0, 98:c1/74, 99:8e/06, 100:d9/b4, 101:bd/0e, 102:00/cd, 103:7c/10
  , 104:88/eb, 105:4e/f5, 106:02/b4, 107:8a/00, 108:56/cd, 109:40/16
  , 111:08/00, 113:13/19, 114:73/eb, 115:05/fe, 116:b9/54, 117:ff/68
  , 118:ff/69, 119:8a/73, 120:f1/20, 121:66/70, 122:0f/61, 123:b6/72
  , 124:c6/74, 125:40/69, 126:66/74, 127:0f/69, 128:b6/6f, 129:d1/6e
  , 130:80/20, 131:e2/64, 132:3f/6f, 133:f7/65, 134:e2/73, 135:86/20
  , 136:cd/6e, 137:c0/6f, 138:ed/74, 139:06/20, 140:41/68, 141:66/61
  , 142:0f/76, 143:b7/65, 144:c9/20, 145:66/61, 146:f7/6e, 147:e1/20
  , 148:66/6f, 149:89/70, 150:46/65, 151:f8/72, 152:83/61, 153:7e/74
  , 154:16/69, 155:00/6e, 156:75/67, 157:38/20, 158:83/73, 159:7e/79
  , 160:2a/73, 161:00/74, 162:77/65, 163:32/6d, 164:66/20, 165:8b/6c
  , 166:46/6f, 167:1c/61, 168:66/64, 169:83/65, 170:c0/72, 171:0c/20
  , 172:bb/69, 173:00/6e, 174:80/73, 175:b9/74, 176:01/61, 177:00/6c
  , 178:e8/6c, 179:2b/65, 180:00/64, 181:e9/20, 182:48/6f, 183:03/6e
  , 184:a0/20, 185:fa/69, 186:7d/74, 187:b4/2e, 188:7d/0a, 189:8b/0d
  , 190:f0/50, 191:ac/72, 192:84/65, 193:c0/73, 194:74/73, 195:17/20
  , 196:3c/61, 197:ff/20, 198:74/6b, 199:09/65, 200:b4/79, 201:0e/20
  , 202:bb/74, 203:07/6f, 204:00/20, 205:cd/72, 206:10/65, 207:eb/62
  , 208:ee/6f, 209:a0/6f, 210:fb/74, 211:7d/2e, 212:eb/2e, 213:e5/2e
  , 214:a0/00, 215:f9/00, 216:7d/00, 217:eb/00, 218:e0/00, 219:98/00
  , 220:cd/00, 221:16/00, 222:cd/00, 223:19/00, 224:66/00, 225:60/00
  , 226:66/00, 227:3b/00, 228:46/00, 229:f8/00, 230:0f/00, 231:82/00
  , 232:4a/00, 234:66/00, 235:6a/00, 237:66/00, 238:50/00, 239:06/00
  , 240:53/00, 241:66/00, 242:68/00, 243:10/00, 245:01/00, 247:80/00
  , 248:7e/00, 249:02/00, 251:0f/00, 252:85/00, 253:20/00, 255:b4/00
  , 256:41/00, 257:bb/00, 258:aa/00, 259:55/00, 260:8a/00, 261:56/00
  , 262:40/00, 263:cd/00, 264:13/00, 265:0f/00, 266:82/00, 267:1c/00
  , 269:81/00, 270:fb/00, 271:55/00, 272:aa/00, 273:0f/00, 274:85/00
  , 275:14/00, 277:f6/00, 278:c1/00, 279:01/00, 280:0f/00, 281:84/00
  , 282:0d/00, 284:fe/00, 285:46/00, 286:02/00, 287:b4/00, 288:42/00
  , 289:8a/00, 290:56/00, 291:40/00, 292:8b/00, 293:f4/00, 294:cd/00
  , 295:13/00, 296:b0/00, 297:f9/00, 298:66/00, 299:58/00, 300:66/00
  , 301:58/00, 302:66/00, 303:58/00, 304:66/00, 305:58/00, 306:eb/00
  , 307:2a/00, 308:66/00, 309:33/00, 310:d2/00, 311:66/00, 312:0f/00
  , 313:b7/...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :
Download full text (7.6 KiB)

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:54:23 +0300
From: Aigars Mahinovs <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: A transcript of a fake VFAT error

This filesystem is absolutely correct, yet the fsck.vfat tries to fix
it. If I let fsck.vfat fix the filesystem, all files residing after
certain treshold in the file system are truncated and shown as lost
chunks. It seams that something is wrong with maximum sector
calculation.

This is with dosfstools of version 2.11-1. This really is a grave bug
- it destroyed my Windows filesystem *twice* before I understud what
was going on. :P

------------------LOG-BEGIN----------------------------
aigarius@aigarhome:~$ sudo fsck.msdos -vn /dev/hda1
dosfsck 2.11 (12 Mar 2005)
dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem
There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
Differences: (offset:original/backup)
  90:33/0e, 91:c9/1f, 92:8e/be, 93:d1/74, 94:bc/7e, 95:f4/ac, 96:7b/22
  , 97:8e/c0, 98:c1/74, 99:8e/06, 100:d9/b4, 101:bd/0e, 102:00/cd, 103:7c/10
  , 104:88/eb, 105:4e/f5, 106:02/b4, 107:8a/00, 108:56/cd, 109:40/16
  , 111:08/00, 113:13/19, 114:73/eb, 115:05/fe, 116:b9/54, 117:ff/68
  , 118:ff/69, 119:8a/73, 120:f1/20, 121:66/70, 122:0f/61, 123:b6/72
  , 124:c6/74, 125:40/69, 126:66/74, 127:0f/69, 128:b6/6f, 129:d1/6e
  , 130:80/20, 131:e2/64, 132:3f/6f, 133:f7/65, 134:e2/73, 135:86/20
  , 136:cd/6e, 137:c0/6f, 138:ed/74, 139:06/20, 140:41/68, 141:66/61
  , 142:0f/76, 143:b7/65, 144:c9/20, 145:66/61, 146:f7/6e, 147:e1/20
  , 148:66/6f, 149:89/70, 150:46/65, 151:f8/72, 152:83/61, 153:7e/74
  , 154:16/69, 155:00/6e, 156:75/67, 157:38/20, 158:83/73, 159:7e/79
  , 160:2a/73, 161:00/74, 162:77/65, 163:32/6d, 164:66/20, 165:8b/6c
  , 166:46/6f, 167:1c/61, 168:66/64, 169:83/65, 170:c0/72, 171:0c/20
  , 172:bb/69, 173:00/6e, 174:80/73, 175:b9/74, 176:01/61, 177:00/6c
  , 178:e8/6c, 179:2b/65, 180:00/64, 181:e9/20, 182:48/6f, 183:03/6e
  , 184:a0/20, 185:fa/69, 186:7d/74, 187:b4/2e, 188:7d/0a, 189:8b/0d
  , 190:f0/50, 191:ac/72, 192:84/65, 193:c0/73, 194:74/73, 195:17/20
  , 196:3c/61, 197:ff/20, 198:74/6b, 199:09/65, 200:b4/79, 201:0e/20
  , 202:bb/74, 203:07/6f, 204:00/20, 205:cd/72, 206:10/65, 207:eb/62
  , 208:ee/6f, 209:a0/6f, 210:fb/74, 211:7d/2e, 212:eb/2e, 213:e5/2e
  , 214:a0/00, 215:f9/00, 216:7d/00, 217:eb/00, 218:e0/00, 219:98/00
  , 220:cd/00, 221:16/00, 222:cd/00, 223:19/00, 224:66/00, 225:60/00
  , 226:66/00, 227:3b/00, 228:46/00, 229:f8/00, 230:0f/00, 231:82/00
  , 232:4a/00, 234:66/00, 235:6a/00, 237:66/00, 238:50/00, 239:06/00
  , 240:53/00, 241:66/00, 242:68/00, 243:10/00, 245:01/00, 247:80/00
  , 248:7e/00, 249:02/00, 251:0f/00, 252:85/00, 253:20/00, 255:b4/00
  , 256:41/00, 257:bb/00, 258:aa/00, 259:55/00, 260:8a/00, 261:56/00
  , 262:40/00, 263:cd/00, 264:13/00, 265:0f/00, 266:82/00, 267:1c/00
  , 269:81/00, 270:fb/00, 271:55/00, 272:aa/00, 273:0f/00, 274:85/00
  , 275:14/00, 277:f6/00, 278:c1/00, 279:01/00, 280:0f/00, 281:84/00
  , 282:0d/00, 284:fe/00, 285:46/00, 286:02/00, 287:b4/00, 288:42/00
  , 289:8a/00, 290:56/00, 291:40/00, 292:8b/00, 293:f4/00, 294:cd/00
  , 295:13...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
In , Petr Salinger (petr-salinger) wrote : missing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in debian/rules

severity 300126 grave
tag 300126 patch
merge 300126 301254
quit

The patch should fix the problem,
which is that mkdosfs needs
to be compiled with large file support.

Revision history for this message
In , Roman Hodek (roman-hodek) wrote : Bug#301254: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2

Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
 dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
 dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
     -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the toplevel Makefile had no effect; added
     $(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
     #300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
     Closes: #300126, #301254.
   * #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
     in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
 995f3cc08408dbe7d2ee2d37e5f8d3f5 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
 5b807e616f4191945b63d602e3513768 8347 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
 5add46c0f2b78d45bfa55e81acc89de1 53266 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3JWD3FdvcRAu2pAJ9xrYDrheNl5BvuCeTCNNJ9+39zIACfQC4Q
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+qQwghpNxQ=
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Roman Hodek (roman-hodek) wrote : Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2

Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
 dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
 dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
     -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the toplevel Makefile had no effect; added
     $(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
     #300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
     Closes: #300126, #301254.
   * #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
     in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
 995f3cc08408dbe7d2ee2d37e5f8d3f5 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
 5b807e616f4191945b63d602e3513768 8347 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
 5add46c0f2b78d45bfa55e81acc89de1 53266 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3JWD3FdvcRAu2pAJ9xrYDrheNl5BvuCeTCNNJ9+39zIACfQC4Q
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+qQwghpNxQ=
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:15:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Petr Salinger <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: missing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in debian/rules

severity 300126 grave
tag 300126 patch
merge 300126 301254
quit

The patch should fix the problem,
which is that mkdosfs needs
to be compiled with large file support.

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2

Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
 dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
 dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
     -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the toplevel Makefile had no effect; added
     $(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
     #300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
     Closes: #300126, #301254.
   * #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
     in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
 995f3cc08408dbe7d2ee2d37e5f8d3f5 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
 5b807e616f4191945b63d602e3513768 8347 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
 5add46c0f2b78d45bfa55e81acc89de1 53266 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3JWD3FdvcRAu2pAJ9xrYDrheNl5BvuCeTCNNJ9+39zIACfQC4Q
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+qQwghpNxQ=
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#301254: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2

Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <email address hidden> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <email address hidden>
Description:
 dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
 dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
     -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the toplevel Makefile had no effect; added
     $(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
     #300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
     Closes: #300126, #301254.
   * #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
     in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
 995f3cc08408dbe7d2ee2d37e5f8d3f5 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
 5b807e616f4191945b63d602e3513768 8347 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
 5add46c0f2b78d45bfa55e81acc89de1 53266 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3JWD3FdvcRAu2pAJ9xrYDrheNl5BvuCeTCNNJ9+39zIACfQC4Q
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+qQwghpNxQ=
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Changed in dosfstools:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.