Activity log for bug #314774
Date | Who | What changed | Old value | New value | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009-01-07 16:48:07 | Bruce Cowan | bug | added bug | ||
2009-01-07 17:38:54 | Chris Coulson | dkms: status | New | Triaged | |
2009-01-07 17:38:54 | Chris Coulson | dkms: importance | Undecided | Low | |
2009-01-07 17:38:54 | Chris Coulson | dkms: statusexplanation | Thank you for your bug report. Certainly, the maintainer field should be fixed at the next upload of the package. As for the dependencies: - awk is a virtual package provided by packages that are not marked as essential (eg, mawk), and so the dependency has to remain. - I don't know about bash because I don't know if there is a reason that dkms depends on bash newer than 1.99 and as you already pointed out from the debian policy, it is acceptable to specify a dependency on an essential package if you require a specific version of that package. | ||
2009-01-21 20:02:41 | Mario Limonciello | dkms: status | Triaged | Fix Committed | |
2009-01-21 20:02:41 | Mario Limonciello | dkms: statusexplanation | Thank you for your bug report. Certainly, the maintainer field should be fixed at the next upload of the package. As for the dependencies: - awk is a virtual package provided by packages that are not marked as essential (eg, mawk), and so the dependency has to remain. - I don't know about bash because I don't know if there is a reason that dkms depends on bash newer than 1.99 and as you already pointed out from the debian policy, it is acceptable to specify a dependency on an essential package if you require a specific version of that package. | fixed in git commit: b68e9cc3169067a0d92a89a7c0367ed074039032 | |
2009-01-22 21:25:06 | Launchpad Janitor | dkms: status | Fix Committed | Fix Released | |
2009-12-05 11:29:20 | Launchpad Janitor | branch linked | lp:ubuntu/dkms |