Merge/sync debootstrap from Debian Sid
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
debootstrap (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Dimitri John Ledkov |
Bug Description
There are two notable changes from Debian in our debootstrap packaging:
debootstrap (1.0.106ubuntu2
* Revert to last known good version to avoid bugs like
https:/
we merge again.
-- Michael Hudson-Doyle <email address hidden> Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:01:58 +1200
debootstrap (1.0.106ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* debootstrap does not make a destinction between priviledged and
unpriviledged lxd containers. When setting up devices, try to use the
old simple device setup, and if that fails, then fallback to the new
bind-setup. Blind attempt to unbreak cloud image livefs building, as
PPA is failing to build this package for me, thus cannot self-trigger
a livefs build to test this before uploading.
-- Dimitri John Ledkov 🌈 <email address hidden> Fri, 06 Jul 2018 12:32:07 +0100
---
Here's the most recent changelog from Debian:
debootstrap (1.0.107) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Patrick McDermott ]
* Fix wgetprogress() with --debian-installer (Closes: #829725)
[ Dan Nicholson ]
* Strip URL scheme from apt lists (Closes: #903481)
[ Hideki Yamane ]
* Fix docker detection breaks QEMU's binfmt_misc bootstraping
(Closes: #903657)
- Avoid removing host's /proc on some environment
- Add workaround for second-stage inside docker
* Align scripts/gutsy to scripts/
* Remove unnecessary script files from udeb package
(Closes: #618839, #893713)
-- Hideki Yamane <email address hidden> Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:12:20 +0900
---
It fixes the bug Michael mentioned, but as he stated, careful testing is needed before we merge again.
I am volunteering to drive this, but I would like to track testing in this bug to make sure nothing is broken before we do this merge.
Assuming Dimitri upstreams his changes to Debian, I would also like to raise attention to this: should we add it to the sync blacklist or keep a permanent delta which is only a changelog entry? If it is going to be problematic, proper testing is surely needed to make sure it doesn't break again, but should action be taken to make that an extra step?
Thanks.
tags: | removed: block-proposed |
Changed in debootstrap (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Adding block-proposed, so if someone doesn't see this bug and decides to go ahead anyway, they'll have to look here.