Lucid installer creates bad RAID setup

Bug #563343 reported by Matthew Caron
12
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
debian-installer (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: debian-installer

Installed 10.04 Beta 2 on to 2 500GB hard disks. Partitions were as follows:

/dev/sda1 1GB
/dev/sda2 The rest

/dev/sdb1 1GB
/dev/sdb2 The rest

/dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 were combined into /dev/md0
/dev/md0 was formatted as ext4 and assigned to be /boot.

/dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2 were combined into /dev/md1
/dev/md1 was selected as physical device for LVM
LVM was set up with all the other expected partitions swap, /, /opt, /var, /home, /tmp

After reboot, splash screen complained about not being able to mount /boot.

Dropped to a prompt to find:
- /dev/md0 had not been started
- /dev/md1 had been started

Started /dev/md0

mdadm --detail /dev/md0 reported that disk 0 was removed and disk 1 was /dev/md1p1

mdadm --detail /dev/md1 reported that disk 0 was /dev/sda and disk 1 was /dev/sdb

I suspect that, somehow, the installer is not using the components which it was told to do, and /dev/md1 is using components which overlap with /dev/md0, thus corrupting the data contained therein and rendering it unmountable.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Caron (matt-mattcaron) wrote :

Retested under the RC.

Additional info:

Dropping to a console under the installer shows correct output from mdadm --detail /dev/mdX, so it looks like this is only a problem after reboot, like it's not committing the settings correctly when finishing up.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Caron (matt-mattcaron) wrote :

This *might* be fixed in the actual release. I've tested it in a VM and it works as it should. Need to test on real hardware.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Caron (matt-mattcaron) wrote :

I finally got back to this.

This is *not* fixed in the actual release.

It is *still* broken in 10.04.01

It works correctly in 10.10.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Caron (matt-mattcaron) wrote :

This is actually a duplicate of #591721

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.